163 karma · joined November 29, 2011
Can anyone point me to examples where my thinking is wrong, where changes came from the demand side?
This would be rare, but would still kill a few thousand people every year. Wouldn't it be natural then to tweak the algorithm to reduce the death toll? I can imagine the public demanding it, and the software engineers to start writing code that deals with the rare case where an accident is inevitable. It could start very simple (avoid large groups of people), but could get more advanced over time.
If you are interested in learning more about unions, I recommend reading Confessions of a Union Buster, by Marty Levy. Any other book recommendation about the topic?
I am surprised that our voting system hasn't evolved much since the 18th century, despite its many problems. It is high time for some disruption.
One small piece of important information that wasn't much discussed in the article: a big advantage of these systems is that they make primary elections obsolete (because they are immune to the spoiler effect). The reflection on the 2016 US presidential elections would be more interesting when considering all the candidates of the primaries, all competing in a single race.
It's the same way that good grammar is only one of the skills involved in writing a great novel. Some scholars really grok grammar, and are excellent at teaching it, yet they haven't written great novels. I'm thinking of William Strunk Jr (of "The Elements of Style" fame), for example.