1,733 karma · joined February 13, 2023
(Ex-CG/VFX renderer dev)
For example, in 1996/1997, Digital Domain (VFX industry) used a 'render farm' cluster of Carrera Alpha workstations running NT to render the Titanic film, instead of SGIs running IRIX. (SGIs were still often used on the artists workstations though, but progressively that shifted).
By 2001, many of those machines were x86 which were then often as fast as the SGIs and Alphas, even with x86's stack-based floating point architecture which handicapped it a bit, and the significantly higher memory bandwidth and larger caches of the SGIs.
With a swarm of them working together at speeds humans would be unlikely to match (in terms of iterating on different attempts progressively), it's a lot easier to see how they could overwhelm targets.
Old Apple would never have done that I don't think.
Semi-on-topic: I've noticed that many LLMs via coding agents (ChatGPT and Claude at work with my CoPilot account, and DeepSeek 4 and ChatGPT in pi.dev at home) really seem to like using unicode / emoji characters for things like arrows (for things like test value ranges), crosses and ticks (for pass vs fail in test comments), instead of plain ASCII. Codebases are almost exclusively ASCII chars to my knowledge, although they're UTF-8 files.
I'm not yet using agents to write code (only do code reviews, write example prototypes I then copy bits of, and helping craft tests), but I'm likely to get there soon, and I'm sure it's possible to prompt them NOT to do this, but has anyone else noticed this? I wonder if that changes things over time for them if this is a common theme of increased non-ASCII output?
What about stock photography, IMO as much as I personally hate "overcooked" AI-generated imagery, it doesn't annoy me that much more than stock photography does on blogs.
I do however use it as a gauge of "if the images are generated by AI, how much of the text content is?" though, so...
Since then Canada and the UK in particular (and NZ and Australia) have had various different fluctuations in subsidies for various parts of filming / doing post-production of movies over the intervening years.
(I've been using it via OpenRouter and it's much more than that, but still cheap).
Morph occasionally have lower prices than the standard rates, and:
https://telnyx.com/pricing/inference-api
Is one which is a bit cheaper... I haven't actually tried K3 myself...
No, I'm using it via OpenRouter in pi.dev - I just used it 30 mins ago... Providers (automatically selected): StreamLake and Baidu Qianfan.
Personally, I'm having surprisingly good results with DeepSeek 4 Pro at home, which is very good value for money: it's not as good as Claude / GPT 5.6 (I have Co-pilot license at work), but it's still really useful for code reviews, validating thoughts, and especially designing / writing unit tests for new (and old before refactoring) functionality.
And it's very cheap per task. (Flash is even cheaper, but I've had issues with that on more complex tasks where it starts forgetting things and arguing with itself "but wait, let me read the function again").
It looks like they've taken this mostly from an older Boeing BWB design for future air-to-air refueling aircraft (although the wing shape is a bit different).
(Maybe it's one of those that supports split outputs for multiple screens for all passenger positions? - i.e. kids in the back? That might be a bit more understandable.)
I bizarrely had Opus 4.8 this week (in pi.dev within a podman container, using openrouter) start installing various python packages (and uv!) within the environment (not as root) when I asked it to code review some fairly basic Rust .rs files that were generally stand-alone (it did very nicely work out and write some stubs for them to build them and work out how they worked).
It only gave up with the weird Python installing stuff when it discovered one of the Python packages needed Tensorflow.
It seems pretty focused and persistent in continuing its initial approach, and I'm wondering if I need to alter some instructions / initial prompts to rein it in a bit...
It seems a lot of people on here don't understand that.
So most subdirectory URLs get two requests from Claude bot, the first one needless because that wasn't the URL in the tag.
Is the release of this why Google's share price is down 4.5%?
So yeah, as you say, compilers can be very sensitive to this, and in the past (although more than 10 years ago now, so might not be relevant now), ICC often used to generate better (faster executing) code when using "val += 1" vs "++val".
On my sites, I see ClaudeBot consistently (and has been like this for over a year) ask for "${SITE}.com/base_dir1" and then get the redirect (Caddy does this automatically) to get "${SITE}.com/base1/base_dir1/" (trailing slash).
The hrefs on my sites include the trailing slashes for directories, so looks like ClaudeBot's internal code is stripping them off before requesting them, and therefore essentially makes almost 2x the requests to my sites for directories, half of them ending up being redirects back to the same url but with the trailing slash.
Drawing a splodge in roughly the location (not sure if there's range info either? I doubt it if it's passive) overlaid on the video likely won't cut it...