3,570 karma · joined April 5, 2018
If a law is defeated by something as simple as that, what’s the point of having the law? It’s like saying if you commit crimes wearing gloves you get to walk because there are no fingerprints.
Somewhat disagree on this, since open sourcing their model and code would help a lot of people in a lot of different ways.
Seems like the only winners standing in this scorched earth is Satya and his shareholders.
:s/Xenu/AGI/g(By spice I mean money here for those unfamiliar with the reference)
I assume GP is talking in context of OpenAI/general AI research, where you need a PhD to apply for the research scientist positions and MS/Bachelors to apply for research engineer positions afaik.
Did anyone believe that he seriously believed in that? I thought the consensus was he was angling for a government backed monopoly with OpenAI as the “steward” of large AI models.
Better trust them this time, then! It’s not like they have anything to gain from spreading this news (read rumor), right?
1. Your kidneys, or heart, or any vital organ.
2. Weapons grade Plutonium.
3. Falcon heavy.
4. A single grain of rice, 100 million times.
What you are saying implies “we don’t have a good marketplace for user data”, which is pretty obvious. But I have no idea how “thus it is worth nothing” follows from there.
All I am getting is “you’re getting conned, he is the conman.”
You can like the content while hating the delivery mechanism and trying to fix it up to the best of your ability.
Or they can drop the adtech business or spin it out as a separate company. But either way currently there is no way to fairly deal with ad tech companies with thinly veneered “free” services on top.
Is that supposed to make him look good? Because it doesn't, in fact it makes him look very out of touch at best and a complete fool at worst.