1,126 karma · joined July 11, 2020
When my wife was pregnant and we didn't know the gender yet I did a lot of reading on attachment theory and what truth there is to "daddy issues" etc. in case it was a girl. It's a trope, but there's something to it.
As it turns out we have a lovely baby boy. Now, to avoid traumatizing him...
I've found that having a whiteboard in my office helps me jot down quick mathematical ideas as soon as they come (but note how simpler this is due to the home office wave), but that doesn't work well for fleeting thoughts of a more philosophical or conceptual nature.
There's a lot of innovation going on for conscientious people to have a better UI to keep notes, but really all innovation can happen post hoc if you have a text editor and devise a quick text language for linking and metadata (maybe based off something like yaml to cut down on parser writing). The open problem is how to stop losing the fleeting thoughts of smart distracted people.
It's a big schlep, cue in Paul Graham essay.
This is like: there are scholarly books that quote extensive from original philosophers -- long, third-of-a-page quotations. Still I should be able to quote something in its original language (translations may be copyrighted) copying from the derived work. Copyrighted work is not supposed to be able to poison noncopyrighted work it originates from.
Basically the note-taking gizmo is a graph. Nodes are given conceptual masses either through pagerank or betweenness centrality (i.e. either through how many random walks or how many shortest paths cross a node). Then we calculate a potential energy (gravity potential) if we by inverting the graph laplacian (a few methods are available). Special attention is given to nodes that "float the most.
E: forgot to link to it! https://github.com/asemic-horizon/sursis/
At some point there was a plugin for Google Docs where you could record the actual typing of a document; supposedly if good writers (even on the order of Spolsky/Graham) did it, we could stand to learn a lot.
My startup is developing that way, although with more like 9 services owned by 3 developers. (We have no bus factor). Is there anything interesting I can read about your methodologies -- I mean standard references, books, tutorials? (Lerna? Yalc?)
It's probably due to hidden third causes (the kind of personality + circumstance + challenges that cause people to abstain from TV are the same that cause this and that positive outcome), but it's there, at least according to lots of anecdata in this very same thread.
The relevant Deleuze texts (A Thousand Plateaus) can be infuriating if you’re not open to this whole other style of thinking, but Deleuze is no postmodern, he’s a realist and a materialist and sort of a science worshipper, albeit from an angle that would make Neil deGrasse Tyson start bleeding from his nose until he passed out, if he ever grokked it. Start with Delanda, probably.
[googling a little, this isn’t great but isn’t bad for something readily accessible: http://dar.aucegypt.edu/bitstream/handle/10526/3534/DeLanda%... ]
Of note: INSTANTLY. You can pay a random handyman you need in an emergency, or split bar tabs, or pay out-of-pocket expenses with doctors, whatever. I use it in lieu of credit cards for e-commerce too.
https://www.paymentsjournal.com/why-pix-is-the-revolution-of...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pix_(electronic_payment_syst...
I have this desire to create a (maybe domain-specific / not Turing) programming language. I have some use cases involving constraint satisfaction but basically it's a rock'n roll dream kind of thing for me.