834 karma · joined January 11, 2020
This being 2D doesn’t strike me as a huge drawback
Is what the article says. What it doesn’t say is whether Roche will actually do so, or use stalling tactics. One shouldn’t count their chickens before they hatch.
But I think most anthropologists define community as traditionally involving shared resources and problems. Traditionally this entailed a geographic proximity, but it didn’t have to (e.g., the HIV activist community in the 80s and 90s). Given that geography isn’t actually a requirement, you might ask a fair question: what proportion of online “communities” are communities at all, and does that relate to their “health”, however you define it. In that instance, you might refer to health as the ability to marshal resources to effectively manage those problems. By that definition, HN isn’t a community at all - it marshals no resources, tackles no problems, and has no common set of either. Health is orthogonal.
Wish we knew which way to jump.
I wonder if they’ve gotten better - or if just their marketing has.
Cool! That’s an interesting idea. I could see particular attributes of DNA being corrected, but How would a molecular basis for inheritance be disproven? After all, we see the molecule on microscopy, we modify it, etc. A dis-proof would have to remain consistent with all of that. What would that look like?
So... ok.
Mist it with rubbing alcohol and stick it in a sunny corner for a few days.
Where does one do that?