581 karma · joined June 11, 2008
What they are doing at freedownloadzone is exactly that "theft of information and abuse of credit cards".
During the process of deciding, I might encounter a movie that I watched, I would vote for it.
BTW, what is the incentive for people to vote other than what I have described above? I would suggest adding comments apart from just ratings. Sometimes a movie appeals to me so much that I look forward to write something about it. It works the other way too. I've seen enough horrible movies that I come home so pissed that I need to vent. :-)
It would be hard to imagine being profitable (or sustainable) just focusing on hardware. It can sustain itself if you broaden your audience.
My dad used to say "At the end of the day we all are alive because of the trust we have for one another". Whether you know that person or not, we inherently place that trust in others.
(1) set up a non-government board consisting of credible VCs, entrepreneurs, and lawyers to vet applicants.
It probably is a better solution than what PG proposed in his original essay. "let the market decide. Startup investors work hard to find the best startups. The government could not do better than to piggyback on their expertise, and use investment by recognized startup investors as the test of whether a company was a real startup."
PG's version would eliminate anyone who would bootstrap a startup without external funding. Brad's is a little inclusive.
I would rather prefer to leave it at "let the market decide."
Any interesting ideas as to how you could convert that statement into an actionable policy for immigration authorities to follow?
A great interview on NPR at http://www.pri.org/theworld/?q=node/14897
and more information here: http://www.tractortractor.org/english/
We see this so many areas. China's GDP is growing 12% every year and the US has grown just 2% type of arguments.
I haven't been able to improve on my yearly salary raise of 300% in the last 15 years when I went from 5$/hr to 15$/hr
I looked up to these guys because of an inherent bias that, I never went to these schools and these guys must be gooood. After working with lots of them for a few years, if there is one thing I can tell you its this. HBS didn't teach the founders anything about startups or the business world. Ivy league schools didn't teach much about how to deliver a product to the guys.
BTW, The worst hacker in the group was the professor :-)
"Provide health care to everyone, employer subsidized, co-ops, non-profit".
"solar powered clean drinking water for rural areas".
I might as well say "Space time continuum, user generated, freemium"
the LA chapter has: "Franchising: The New Solution" Featuring Rajiv Trivedi, VP of La Quinta Corp"
Tech startups in LA are few and far in between. I visited some outfits out of UCLA campus and the attitude in general was "Me and my professor are world renowned in this field, I don't need to answer anything about our business model"
Wife: Who is "Roy Fielding"?
Me: Some guy. He’s smart.
Wife: Oh? What did he do?
Me: He helped write the first web servers and then did a ton of research explaining why the web works the way it does. His name is on the specification for the protocol that is used to get pages from servers to your browser.
Wife: Oh, sorry, I thought he was in that movie with Jennifer Aniston.
Me: The web is pretty amazing really. And the funny thing is that it’s all very undervalued. The protocol I was talking about, HTTP, it’s capable of all sorts of neat stuff that people ignore for some reason.
Wife: Can you please stop it. I've been trying to catch the finale of ER for the longest time.
Me: But HTTP is really simple to explain.
Wife: Some other time honey, not now.
I would disagree about how much choice we have once you are down and out. I would like to think otherwise but I'm where I am because of where I was born, my family, friends and circumstances. May be some choices I've made here and there might have made a difference. On the other hand, I've know so many people who were much smarter than I will ever be, end up in bad social standing because of the things I've mentioned like family.and circumstances.
While true, the same holds for all information that we have online that is important to us. But it's a big mental block that both these sites need to overcome. Yodlee kinda shifted that burden by selling software to financial providers whom we already trust by opening accounts.
I am sure Yodlee.com is a profitable company but I do not think their investors will ever see much return on the 110 million dollars worth of investment since 1999.
If you take away Yodlee powered backend, Mint.com does not have much going on for them other than the subscriber base. If you have a hard time monetizing from the subscribers you have, It's just going to be a long painful ride for everyone involved.
I would suggest to make it obvious that users have a URL that they can share. Give suggestions during signup for their preferred web address. eg: http://jobspice.com/firstname
Goodluck to you.
At least where I grew up, water was always hard to come by. If you ever jumped into our water well, you would die at half way to the bottom from heart failure. It's probably half a mile deep :-)
However, If you have a problem that requires code fixes, I cannot imagine having to deal with a long line of people who have no power to make those changes.
The only people who knew what was going on with a huge product were the developers who actually wrote it. But you had to go thru so many layers to get to the developers, irrespective of silver or gold or platinum support. I would never ever pay for support of another product that comes from a big corporation.
We went opensource with our products and every developer responded directly to questions from customers. It made a big difference to the users.