puppetmaster3

Clearly Google internally said they should license it and that they should remove the copy righ from the code.

Right? http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/05/top-programmer-de...

Also cheaper and faster, a good way to save tax resources maybe?

Investor seem to like bombastic claims and bombastic people.

The problem is with source theft(cut paste): http://majadhondt.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/googles-9-lines

Clearly what they did is read how the code in question works, then stole the idea to do it their way. They were looking at the source code! They did not start w/ API, there is no clean room argument that can stand ground to reason. I blame the Oracle lawyers for loosing.

It's simple, as a professional developer (that gets paid, more is better) I want companies to get paid for software and well.

When they don't, I'm not happy, so I hope Oracle wins. But Google will win, not because they are right. Oracle's lawyers are idiots as they can't show it's same. For example run apache http client jar on android and java. It's same. Idiots.

And would you want Google to violate GPL?

'This is true, most of the time.'

You can just stop there.

Unless the driver is also a Lyft driver and decides to use both. Most do.

Also, Payroll taxes are regressive IMO.

No it's not.

That's why I said that you have not used it in anger in production environments. Anyway, good luck.

It's quite simple: Don't do drugs.

Next question please.

If your libs use multiple loggers, then you are SOL.

I don't believe you.

Even the docs say it does not work w/ multiple loggers. But I'm not here to teach, good luck.

I doubt that you have used the SLF4J bridge in any realsitic situation, else you would not say that it works.

The logging in java is supper idiotic. This is because everyone agrees that Java's logging is shit.

So every library uses something else. I have a small project and have 4 logging systems (that I had to integrate).

ps: if you are a business person and have an option on this, I don't care for it regardless of your pov.

Up next: Hillary.

"Software Development is going to be a competitive advantage"

Let me fix that: if done well.

My guess is that the rest of the USA calls it 'the left coast', as in left-leaning.

Compared to middle that is conservative leaning.

She is for sale, and apparently worth the money.

You had me at Feinstein.

Some software is approved. Others, including open source is banned: dangerous.

Feinstein!

(unrelated Feinstein http://youtube.com/watch?v=HVOuK_KB9ew )

Investors don't do DD.

Did you watch the entire hour of video? They do get to it.

Built by suckers!

O ba ma: https://www.rt.com/usa/340313-obama-saudi-pages-classified/#...

More on HRC:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=wK2K5v5bm0Q

Programming is a dead end job, mostly for immigrants. What you want is an MBA.

Yes, based on all the aliens, this checks out.

In most EU countries they would be jailed.

Yes, and Turkey (80 million middle eastern people) will get EU membership.

Merkel cut a deal w/ Turkey to take back immigrants in return for EU membership.

link: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-germany-tu...

This is normal treatment of developers world wide as developers are viewed by MBA as blue collar workers.

What is the best way for me to avoid this?

1. Oracle's lawyers are idiots as they can't show it's same. For example run apache http client jar on android and java. It's same. Idiots.

2. If Oracle's dumb lawyers win, I'm happy. I get paid a salary to work. Why should companies get code for free, why do they need me. Copying and violating a license is bad. Even GPL and other code I write, respect the license.

3. To summarize, would you want Google to violate GPL?