In science, debate is encouraged. Seems that some are scared of a debate.
343 karma · joined April 6, 2012
In science, debate is encouraged. Seems that some are scared of a debate.
Sort of like: buy one get one free (of slower clock speed).
I am impressed. (by the effective marketing deflecting the importance of clock speed).
2. If Oracle's dumb lawyers win, I'm happy. I get paid a salary to work. Why should companies get code for free, why do they need me. Copying and violating a license is bad. Even GPL and other code I write, respect the license.
3. To summarize, would you want Google to violate GPL?
I assume this is from a left POV, I see it as plus that a local business succeeds, or a new local hosting gets built, at worst more tax revenue = more services. I wonder to self if higher education is also viewed as bad, as it has same effect - higher local prices. So the outcome to anti-gentrification is the abandoned neighborhoods that investors would not want to develop. Not something we can solve, just a warning to business to not grow in the anti-gentrification areas.
Nothing all stoping, DIY, in fact encouraged. I agree .ts is great, and who ever desires a lib to be .ts, the only questions is: if you desire it, than make it so.
Sometimes a car kills: ergo, lets ban cars.
Children.
Maybe use big data bayesian statistics to predict voters that will vote against them.
I see this as sign of coming total control, followed by lack of initiative and stagnation of humanity.
It seems to me that the progressives main thing is to tell and enforce how others should live and behave, that is the core of the left, the other ideas are just branches. Evidence is the congress votes in USA by Left to start wars and votes by Taxed Enough Already (TEA) to defund the wars.
If you are anti war, I invite you to check out the Right, Libertarian POV.
So the politicians have a free hand. For an empirical illustration : http://youtube.com/watch?v=HVOuK_KB9ew 85,000 callers out of 90,000 callers to a California senator (representing among others Silicon Valley) wanted a no vote. Senator voted yes. Or http://bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03hd981
Confidence level is 15% with media support, this is normal: http://pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm You have a choice of 2 parties. It is not a Euro style multi party democracy. Ex: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerland
So: most people support Snowden, despite thought shaping that happens on forums. And Aaron. And Ian. Daniel. Hastings. But in age of big data, surveillance meta data can be used bayesian/predictive for internal politics (not for 'scary' external imagination). The winning move then is to be or appear passive. And anticapte tyrany. hth
It's micro services. Remember 2000 data centers? Everyone was afraid to go Cloud.
I predict cloud is going to die, like it or not, up next is microservices by many names. http://www.programmableweb.com/apis/directory
That is the future.
Oh, look, here they go again.
Your money. Not his money.
I'd love to see his CV.
They won't game the results. There was some research done, I forget date and author, something about 'origin of species'
This is just a light one, that is the point.