1 karma · joined February 17, 2023
If you couldn’t turn a profit during practically the best time for tech startups in 2020-21, I can’t see how you can turn a profit when money is much tighter.
I still paid for it and justified it in my head that this is the first time I’ll be traveling in two and a half years.
But if I had to do it again, I can’t justify it at all. There has to be some level of “spite spending” from two years of pandemic as well - people who know that they’re overpaying but they do it anyway because they’ve been locked up for two years.
Even ENS domain usage has been going up because of the speculative frenzy around valuable domain names (look up the race to register all 3-letter ENS names).
You can start off by naming three projects that you actually use regularly outside of speculative investments. Because for the life of me, I can't.
The core ideas behind crypto remain solid. Unfortunately that has been hijacked completely by speculators.
The scams wouldn't even be a problem - every fledgling platform has them - but the fact that the crypto community embraces scams and even encourages them. Scammers can rug a project for millions and turn around and launch another project within a week and everyone will still buy it because of greed.
And this is the crypto dilemma: the crypto community has utterly failed at self-regulation. Ergo, it has to be regulated by the government. However, a cryptocurrency that's beholden to government rules is antithetical to the core crypto ideas of self-ownership, privacy, and freedom.
I'm not trolling, but I really don't know what this real utility is. I've been extremely active in crypto for two years (as a user, not a trader) and I still don't know if there is any real utility, outside of gated access to communities and/or voting on DAO proposals. Whatever utility there is either very minor or refers to something in the future.
In two years, everything in crypto has largely been the same. Transactions on Metamask run the same way. Mobile experience is uniformly awful. Buying shitcoins is still using the same old crummy Uniswap interface. The only difference is that there are a bunch of new chains VCs can pump and dump on.
Most projects in crypto are deeply involved in navel gazing. All these bridge projects are a good example - they all hail it as "revolutionary" if you can transfer funds from Sol to ETH. Outside of crypto, people ask "but why?"
Google search volume doesn't collapse if the stock market isn't doing well. You still send emails even in a recession.
No one uses crypto outside of speculation. Even the dApp with the most "mainstream" use case, OpenSea, has collapses in usage as soon as the market turns bearish. Why? Because no one wants to buy "digital art" when there is no bigger fool to sell it to.
I haven't even logged into my Metamask for weeks now.
Would you call that a successful product?
Once you go beyond these functional but boring DeFi projects, you run into a ton of scams, wild "experiments for the sake of experiments", and projects that are just trying to extend the ponzis built on top of established protocols.
Take all the forks. One algostable becomes successful and suddenly there are hundreds of forks that collapse within days, sometimes hours (TOMB is an example).
Most of the promises of DeFi are absolutely nothing but pure ponzis that collapse once new money stops coming in. OHM chart is the best example. "Reserve currency" that dropped 99% because new money stopped coming in.
What it essentially boils down to is the simple question: what's the use of these projects besides making money? Don't get me wrong - speculation can be a use case. But I've never heard of speculators take the holier-than-thou, "we'll change the world" tone that crypto proponents seem to take.
That's how much impact crypto has had on the world in 15 years.
But I've spent two years in this space and I've come out thoroughly disillusioned. The vast majority don't even care about privacy or ownership or decentralization - they just want to know "wen pump?"
If you were a manufacturer, you had no real way to deal with this unpredictability. Do you add capacity to cater to the post-lockdown 200 demand? If you do, you might end up with too much inventory as demand goes back to the usual 100.
Throw in the clogged up ports and higher input costs due to Russia-Ukraine war and we have this strange period where everyone is confused and no one really knows what to do
I've been out of touch with the startup world the last few years, but something seems to have changed where otherwise mature companies with low-mid four-digit employee counts still work as "startups" (complete with the lack of profitability).
Everything is either completely unnecessary or a "nice to have". Like, say, trading video game assets. Or digital art. All nice to haves, but nothing that would even remotely warrant the kind of valuations the segment commands.
How did these companies overestimate demand so much? Surely they could have seen that the demand from the pandemic years was an anomaly and not a sustainable "new normal"?
Airbnbs are now exclusively for the rare trip that lasts longer than a week where I largely intend to stay inside.
In tourist places, I've also found that hotels are much better located
This just might be the “new normal”. The lack of readily available products might be a problem, but there’s also a good chance we see much higher wages across the board
1 BTC is always equal to 1 BTC.
Crypto markets fall apart as quickly as they go up. Most who entered the market in late 2021 are down and will be down for years (forever if they're holding some dead altcoin).