pwillia7

What is new math

encoded

haha

The Unabomber manifesto talks about this a surprising amount too -- https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unab...

Almost to the letter -- https://www.dalmomendonca.com/rules-for-rulers

how do we feel about messing with history trying to repair broken statues? https://imgur.com/a/sAeWnCp

I had the same epiphany about LLM as UI trying to build a front end for a image enhancer workflow I built with Stable Diffusion. I just about fully built out a Chrome extension and then realized I should just build a 'tool' that llama can interact with and use open webui as the front end.

quick demo: https://youtu.be/2zvbvoRCmrE

How would the SIMS that contain the user prefs and whatnot not have the same issues described in the paper as the agents themselves?

All these people that think big archaeology is wrong because of gobekli Teppe and they now have a couple seasons of the Netflix show referenced in this thread

The slow movingness of Science with its method and peer reviewing definitely fights against new ideas becoming accepted overnight, but we do get there, and glomming onto personalities with unaccepted ideas will hurt your 'correctness' more than help it.

I watched some of the first season and was actually already open to all the alt archaeology stuff with the precision arguments people make, but the more I looked the more clear it was just BS.

I think the biggest thing about the old world people miss (and thus makes alt archeology so attractive) is the mass use of slaves and general lack of caring about human suffering.

I couldn't believe Red Fort was built in 9 years in 1640, until I had that epiphany, for instance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Fort

I am with you on #1 -- I write a lot of tutorials but I'm not trying to help you learn how to open a terminal. I'd prefer to lose those readers up front rather than frustrate them for 30 minutes.

#2 is too far. If people want to misuse your stuff, shame on them, but don't boobie trap it!

Who like hermits and people that follow asceticism?

haha that was my first question/thought

I see you're not the OP that said that so I am sorry.

Come on -- It's not more presumptive and rude than to take another person's feelings of their own dead loved ones and mortality and call it disgusting and perverse. Please take a moment and reflect on "The Other" and the fact that we're all humans made of the same parts.

I sought to ask questions and learn why your experience differed from mine. I would ask what your goals were entering into this conversation and if that's a quality you want to cultivate within yourself.

Have a great weekend :)

You must not have dementia in your family then -- Take that as a blessing

Why do you view it as disgusting? I have a great fear of sullying my good name and burdening my family before I get out of here

I LOVE IT!!!!!

Yeah it is so dumb seeing the shady shit when it's so not needed -- reminds me of that wild Alec baldwin prosecutor

Wonder if anyone snuck in some AI images

the real unfairness is they didn't have Netflix and dairy queen -- just brioche

Enter artisanal programming

This tracks with my feelings making and using Stable Diffusion Loras and fine tunes. Still, with the speed to train and use, Loras have worked for me in most use cases and it hasn't been worth fine tuning the entire model.

they can't fetch the memories and psychological traumas so far

Say hello to your new Subscription products

Yeah! If the children want to lay my rail road lines for pennies, who the hell are the regulators to tell me and them we can't do that?!?!?

How do they even pretend that works when some South Asians are shorter and the Danes are so large? Are the Danish just 100% obese?

This says it's <20% there[1][2]

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_human_height_by_countr...

2: https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/33/3/463/7058153

Which word was meant to be used instead of non-profit here?

While I love the use of passive aggressive language, in this case, as it was originally written, "However, if you are not interested in factual information, the answer is: YES" causes some globule of confusion to the primary reader --

Is this to imply that the answer Yes to the question about Matt's control over the organizations named WordPress is _not_ in fact factual?

Dictated not read.

YMHAOS