pylua

I don’t know why it would be illegal, but it feels skeevy. Besides, Disney has a a good legal team — I wouldn’t be surprised if they could find a reason.

Is it even legal to view that data ?

And earlier this year my ssn was on the dark web due to their leak (or vendor). One year of monitoring? No, I’m going to need it for life.

Security is not a concern. There is no real incentive to change the status quo. Make them pay for monitoring indefinitely .

I’m sure Elon is laughing his ass off, just due to the irony.

I feel like this is typically not the right choice.

Actually , no. More like the environment is so toxic people are just rushed and forced to do what they can do instead of what they should. Too much work demanded to be done in too little time so naturally the work is poor. People have families to feed so they try their best, but are ultimately overwhelmed.

Good people leave because it is toxic and stressful. The people that stay are miserable and do what they can. People may complain to management that it is not possible but everything is swept under the rug.

Work may get outsourced to other countries where there a language barriers or no way to hold the firm accountable. However, the firm promises everything at half the price, and will refuse to deliver bad news. All the ceo sees is that the profits are up.

It is a consequence of demanding growth over people. Since it takes years for the negatives to manifest itself the causes listed above are obfuscated. People that have only worked behind a desk but never in a warehouse are probably wondering what went wrong.

That’s a better way to look at it. I wonder what the average tenure of people at Boeing / maintenance techs is.

I wonder if employees across the board are silently reciprocating the lack of support from businesses by doing subpar work, given that corporations have started to run down employees in the name of expanding profits.

It feels like a new phenomenon , and it feels very wide spread.

Yeah, but you can’t manually encode every rule of common sense — especially if the rule is more analog than discrete.

Having it generate really complicated code involving lots of math and physics typically fails.

It’s not just software folks who are going to be run over. I use it to answer all sorts of questions I have in a variety of fields I know nothing about. It truly is a deflationary force.

I feel often times that common sense violates rules. For instance, driving over a double yellow to give more space to something inside of the road. Maybe it is a set of rules some of which exist outside of common law.

What will be left to produce in the United States? I have a negative feeling about the opportunity leaving the country, from white collar to blue collar. Part of the problem is that the dollar is way too strong.

If things are so objective, what is the role of ai in this process ?

If I want someone to roast my startup idea I can just take it directly to a bank or vc.

Since making a decision in itself is subjective, does it matter if ai makes a decision ? Two bankers may have two conclusions on the same data, or may have two different risk tolerances or strategies.

As for audibility, all of the data is kept and archived. Ai is not deleting the data that is captured. I’m certain you could use an llm to generate convincing arguments either way based on an application.

For rejections they should be manually reviewed in most cases to cover your liability.

I believe this line of thought was one of the drivers of the original separation of church and state premise.

You would be surprised. Banking companies / their vendors for instance will outsource to india and Poland. Some of the people in Poland are citizens of Belarus. Us customer data is all over the world (account numbers / ssn / other personal info ).

It may be stored in the us but accessed by people in lcol areas.

They are probably outsourcing to a vendor who will do god knows what with it

This is more like a magic wand in terms of its effectiveness . I think that’s the difference.

Even stuff that starts out as premium eventually becomes cheap by knockoffs that don’t respect ip. In my experience the original brands try to buy out the knockoffs.

Standardization of testing is different than standardizing the rate of learning.

Seems like outsourcing to a lab to verify would have equal chances of fraud as the supplier ?

I agree you should be. I don’t think our economic system enforces those checks. In practice auditing and pen testing are just farmed to the lowest cost place that says they will do everything. The system has no proper checks or balances against fraud.

Two things:

Are they legally bound to do the verification themselves ? Seems like it would be more cost efficient to outsource that as well, which would just be prone to fraud.

I did not see it mentioned where they were aware that their suppliers were committing fraud. At these large companies the executives only look at the spreadsheets and take the contracts as fact, regardless if a third party can deliver.

I don’t believe you can do that outsourcing in good faith. However, assuming they did and were lied to, does that constitute liability I would see them arguing they are the victim.

Criminal negligence on the behalf of Boeing sounds like a stretch. If you have to verify the details of the work you outsource then everything would have to be done in house, and there would be no benefit to it. Are you criminally liable if your supplier commits fraud ?

Traveling, traversing meeting rooms. Going on site. There are lots of reasons battery life is important in the corporate world without being present in front of your computer for more than six hours consistently.

That’s not really reasoning, right ? Maybe humans rely disproportionate on association in general.

The other drawback to buying expensive consulting services is that your company does not have the domain knowledge of the solution.