911 karma · joined January 13, 2020
Okrs are primed to be gamed by people seeking to maximize their contributions even if it isn’t relevant to a real world scenario.
I do feel like workers do take on risk, however. People invest their time in a company and can be arbitrarily let go. Years of domain knowledge they have invested that may not be transferable. The people laid off from the fast food franchise I mentioned are having a tough time finding new, relevant employment.
What do you think about companies like Publix and their stock buy in program ? Do you think that is feasible ?
I mean #1. I am mostly talking about companies that pay such low wages that the government needs to subsidize with food stamps and other benefits. Or the fact that the job does not pay enough for rent. I don’t believe the monetary difference between the Walton’s and the cashier is ethical.
On the flip side I have seen employees give their life, blood, sweat and tears to a company that made the owners very wealthy. They were promptly laid off upon sale and did not benefit proportionally (or at all). This was a fast food franchise.
I guess everyone is being squeezed now.
I wish you all the best luck with your business.
Just to do what he is asking you would need a team like oj had but for each simultaneous case. He should start a law firm next.
We may never know the truth but I’m not sure what Tesla is at fault here for or why they would settle. Twice the legal limit for alcohol (alleged) by the driver is very bad for the plaintiff.
As for tech, a lot of companies want everyone to be fungible for the cheapest price as you mentioned. It’s not a market where people feel safe to takes risks or innovate for someone else’s firm, considering there is no amount of loyalty that can keep you from getting laid off.
I haven’t even considered that.