368 karma · joined November 21, 2013
I'm not saying we shouldn't legalize drugs; I'm just saying any such policy change should also include some help for individuals to move away from that life or they'll more-or-less be forced into other illegal activities.
Sometimes people need to change their housing circumstances in a hurry (e.g. bad break up or bad neighbor) and negotiating two real-estate transactions would be time consuming.
In short, there are lots of good reasons people don't want the burden of being a home-owner, but still need a place to live. Someone has to own and be responsible for those places.
There's no particular guarantee that land value will continue to increase either, or that market rates for rentals will continue to increase.
Without bail outs we have the potential to see many more properties bought by the largest companies, who are often far harsher on tenants then small mom-and-pop owners.
If you switched to p2p instead, then each participant would need to send 10 streams instead of 1, and most people's upload bandwidth is much lower than their download (at least in the US).
It's possible for the server to make decisions on which video streams to forward (e.g. last x talkers) to reduce the number of outbound streams, but switching streams takes a bit of time (you'll need to get a new iframe from the just-switched-on participant) which affects the interactivity of the session.
Modern video codecs also allow for layering of into progressive levels of enhancement, so lower detail versions of the stream can be forwarded to participants will lower bandwidth without the server needing to transcode anything. (Not sure if Jitsi has implemented anything like that.)
Really, though, if we consider bikes safe enough for transportation, why can't we have ultralight enclosed EVs?