quikoa

> (at the moment)

That's why. That future is uncertain. So why gamble your future on something that's popular at the moment for something that could change completely a year later?

A language without a large stdlib pushes this that functionality into (transitive) dependencies. I hope more language will adopt batteries included approach.

It'd definitely need a solid team behind this and not just Evan Czaplicki if I were to trust a database with my data.

> something dangerous like AI model developement

It's very dangerous to Anthropic's bottomline!

Is it this one?

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050184962A1/en

> [..] and a plurality of Sensors located in the capacity Surrounding the track ball for detecting pressure directions.

...

> Status Expired

The question is if they'll increase prices as well.

This statistic doesn't show the disproportionate effect it may have on local communities close to these AI datacenters.

Well yes, first hit is free.

Thanks! I know about it but really should be using it more.

Given the title I thought this was just ridiculous:

> I do not care about your taste.

But taste is all that we have left.

And then this:

> If this posts has offended you, then it tells more about you than it does about me.

So the author can't take any criticism.

A YouTube alternative without AI would be nice. It'd be difficult to launch and may require quite some investment before it starts paying off.

YouTube can very clearly mark AI channels without banning/demonetizing them. Unfortunately their automated systems are shit so that won't work well either.

Why not not show these kickass one-shots and prove how awesome AI can be?

> This bizarre fixation that humans are decent at coding is a myth.

I wonder where the LLMs got their training data from.

Some people may continue using AI and publish books but the amount of AI slop would be dramatically lower without extrinsic motivations.

What does your harness do to squeeze that value out of DS4 flash if you don't mind sharing? It'd interesting how it compares to other harnesses (even if it's a qualitative assessment instead of quantitative).

To me it just looks like a marketing stunt.

How will Anthropic be able to rewrite that in Rust and use it for marketing?

> There is no way to stop these so just lets get going.

Except for the times they've tried before and public outrage stopped it. So this defeatist attitude works against us.

How is CC a success when they still have to force subscribers to use it instead of it being a paid product?

Yea it's too bad these poor scrappy startups cannot afford engineers to build decent software.

> it's not an European company serving the LLM

That's a pretty big downside if data privacy and sharing is one of the main concerns.

These improvements are quite promising and I'm looking forward to giving that a spin once it is released.

Will the Windows side for 0.17.x get some compiler improvements as well or is this Linux only?

Deepseek is much cheaper so that means you spend less on CCP than on Anthropic/OpenAI. Then there are third party providers as well.

It is only allowed in unsafe blocks. As long as the unsafe blocks are few and well understood then Rust programmers can contain this to a small well defined portion of a program.

I can't tell if this comment is sarcasm or not. If you let AI run commands you don't understand (especially in production) you may end up with some nasty surprises.

Yes, if code is only a liability then just delete the code and poof liability is gone.

The ultimate piece is not revenue but profit. At some point these enormous investments will have to be earned back. Good luck with that when open weight models are also continuously improving, have cheap providers and for many are already very usable.

Yea I get that, I still wouldn't want to invest a serious amount of time on a product to build on such a platform. Best of luck though maybe it still works as a business.

Vendor lock-in with a monthly subscription where the price can change at any moment or the company may disappear along with your product. I wouldn't build my business on that.

I can't even tell whether this comment is serious or not.