1,456 karma · joined March 1, 2017
Or more likely they'll spend the compute power on the latest JavaScript framework....
I think the parent's suggestion to "just force people to get it" is incredibly simplistic and unfeasible considering the current laws and structure of government.
> eBay’s team knew it was in trouble, according to their own messages
"Ah yes let's stalk these people and just hope they don't decide to take down the license plate." I guess I shouldn't be surprised that people doing awful things have an awful plan, but that's pretty dumb.
I don't know if this study proves it is or it isn't. I'm making the point that there is at least some proof that it is. Why should YouTube be the arbiter of health information? This seems like another example of big tech censorship.
[0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534595/#:~:tex....
[0] https://electrek.co/2018/11/14/tesla-model-3-ccs-2-plug-euro... [1]https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/CCS/CCS_Combo_2_Ad...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Edit: The lawyer made a follow up video clarifying that in routine traffic stops police do have autonomy. So as long as you are reasonable and just showing the policeman you aren't a public menace is seems ok. For any other reason I'd have my lawyer on me no matter what.
Also this video specifically pertains to the 5th US constitutional amendment.
Also IANAL but the guy in the video is.