1,208 karma · joined January 4, 2021
I will not accept that people consider it a PITA. I will teach them, personally if I have to. I have onboarded many.
I’ve been philosophizing on the nature of Bitcoin for a long time. You haven’t given me an attack that would defeat this system yet. If you have a valid attack, I would encourage you to circulate it where technical folks can deal with it.
All you are doing is throwing your opinion that it is useless, the state will defeat it, etc. I mean cool, but coiners will not agree with you. There are many others here that have told you their experiences, threat models and uses.
I know your opinion re usefulness, noted. It contrasts greatly with my experiences.
Some of us dream up ways to keep the State out, you keep dreaming up ways the State will defeat it. It is a cat and mouse game for all eternity. I am confident we will survive.
Is your problem with the network enabling crime? (Internet?)
Now, encryption and by extension cryptocurrency, this is truly revolutionary. They can shoot me in the head, but they cannot read my data, access my devices, or take the money. All that remains is silicon and metal. I like the idea that when I die, everything I have written privately, and every sat I have earned will rest forever, unreachably.
Ransomware is primarily enabled by encrypting your files. How they take payment is irrelevant. No encryption (eg: a universe where AES, RSA, ECEIS is broken), no ransomware.
My position is the fallout of ransomware is enabled by people failing to take backups.
That being said, zcash is a quite useful construction.
What would be required in your mind for you to trust Mina to accurately and retrievably store your life savings?
I also know history, probably better than most on this board. This conversation is about trying to find the crux of your disbelief.
The thing is, you and Bruce are not being original in your arguments. Some of the things you have said are absolutely undeniable the truth. I am saying it doesn’t matter. Nothing you have proposed is existential for an internet protocol, you are throwing gotchas that we mostly disregarded years ago. Sometimes, In practise, worse is better.
I get what you are trying to say, but I counter it by saying the same amount of Bitcoin sats are associated with the same address it was sent to. No haircuts, no confiscation.
Check history. I think you will find folks that bought BTC to avoid a Cyrus haircut are quite happy today. Nb: I was only tangentially referring to Cyprus. I am from another place.
Agree, there is risk for the 5 minutes it takes to transfer the coins out. If you are on boarding from fiat, there is a degree of trust to extend to the exchange. But this is not Bitcoin, it is a centralized exchange. There are other ways to buy and trade coin too. Earning is best.
I knew not to leave coins with MtGox. I knew not to leave them with Cryptsy. This is a lesson I learned from banks.
Can you elaborate how a bad actor, any bad actor, can confiscate, steal, reorder or devalue a UTXO recorded on an immutable blockchain for all eternity?
I’d say a government that outlaws abortion is a tyrannical overlord with no legitimacy. And yet here we are.
We should also ban crime too, that will surely stop it. Why not get rid of general purpose computation and global communication networks while we are torching our technological footprint.
It’s easy to find flaws in any tech. It’s how we adapt that is important.