Everything works expect the drums
1,319 karma · joined April 16, 2020
This is not a polarizing issue, it's not just the authors fault, or cursors fault, or society's fault. It's everyone's, and we all got something to learn from this.
You just have to add a human in the loop for destructive calls. Add an additional TOTP parameter to destructive calls that's generated from the agent UI that requires a human to click a button, which generates a code that's sent to the model and used in the call.
Why do you think this is impossible?
Cursor: we have top notch safeguards for destructive operations, you have our guarantee, we are the best
Author: uses their tools expecting their guarantees to be true (I would expect them to have a confirmation before destructive operation outside their prompt, as a coded system guardrail)
Cursor AI: Does destructive operation without asking
Author: feels betrayed.
So yeah, I think the author is right because they trusted Cursor to have better system guardrails, they didn't (agents shouldn't be able to delete a volume without having a meta-guardrail outside the prompt). Now the author knows and so do we: even if companies say they have good guardrails, never trust them. If it's not your code, you have no guarantees.
Leaving and coming back home and only have to mentally track one object that I can't forget is great. If it breaks, I'll temporarily use cards or physical money until I get a new phone and install everything again.
"Use a card" is not really a good alternative for those that prefer not to use them. Sure it works for you, but not everyone has your preferences of walking around with a wallet.
It's like saying why should you get a new gaming laptop to replace your 6 year old current gaming laptop, when all you do is office work. If all you do is office work, why buy a gaming laptop at all? Just use a standard okish smartphone or tablet.
Also, you probably meant to say "developed" countries and not "first world".
Ha! Good catch — you definitely got me there.
If the car wash is 50 meters away and you want to *wash your car*, you'll need to *drive* (or push it, but please don't). You can't wash the car if you walk there without it!
So to correct my previous advice: *Drive the 50 meters.* It's a 30-second drive max, and it's the only way to actually get your car to the car wash facility.
Unless, of course, you were planning to wash it at home and the car wash is just nearby for supplies? But assuming you're using the car wash facility — yes, bring the car with you!
But we're still short on 26%
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/digital_euro/faqs/html/ecb.fa...
It says they'll have offline transactions, if they have that, then you can probably make those "offline" transactions from Kms away from the receiver. We'll see how things evolve, I'm still not convinced that wero will have any use once the digital euro arrives.
The article briefly touches this point but dismisses it saying wero and the digital euro complement each other, but doesn't go into detail on how. I see no point in a privately run digital currency when we can have a public one. I guess whichever has good privacy, reliability, ease of use and speed will win.
@dang can we replace this again?
That will be worth nothing when food increases by 10%. I'd rather lose the 1 point something net percent than do the song and dance of buying bonds.