raverbashing

Maduro is a coward and has no military power

People here saying it's "unjustified" should go and talk to a displaced Venezuelan.

They only know how to follow the manual

Good, another reason to seize them

BYD selling to Europe would also need to conform to these

I really wonder what are the parts where BYD gets its competitiveness from vs where it might be behind

Software explains a lot, dumping explains some of it but it might not be all of it

So there's Dieselgate for Meta as there is Dieselgate for Honey

The epidemic of people not wearing headphones has been directly caused by the lack of headphone jacks

Sometimes plugging a cord is a minor inconvenience.

But sometimes it's a large inconvenience

Example: if I'm using my laptop for work but at a slightly longer distance (think, using external monitor/keyboard) then it gets annoying (cord has to hang from the connection, or it gets between you and the keyboard, etc)

Ah yes, the removal of headphone jacks, the gift that keeps on giving

Funny that there were always some people here pushing bt audio as "the future", whom I can only assume were the technically shallow but very opinionated people that would die on the smallest technical hills

Yeah and to be honest the research on it is still at the start. Maybe with the advances in protein folding computational research we'll be able to understand this better

Because that's the biological equivalent of that catastrophic bug that only happens in very weird and very specific conditions

I doubt it. In fact I bet it will be quite the contrary

Yes

For the atmospheric one, grow trees and algae

Yes

And maybe even have a (arch dependent) string buffer zone where the actual memory length is a multiple of 4 or even 8

"Always has been" ;)

You're the one advocating to help people whom not even their neighbours who share the same religion want nothing to do with it so I think you're the one who's joking

Hey just fool them once more and the counter goes to zero

Optimizing out a write to (example) an array on the stack seems fine to me.

Optimizing out a function call to a heap pointer (especially memset) seems wrong to me. You called the function, it should call the function!

But it's again the C language saving time not wearing a seatbelt or checking the tire pressure for saving 10s on a 2h trip

I wonder what's the level of mutual ineligibility between DE<>NL (probably DE is easier to NL) but it's funny how Germans sometimes seem to play dumb and not understand a thing in NL

Nope it is the C committee

> Once you accept that optimizing compilers do, well, optimizations

Why in tarnation it is optimizing out a write to a pointer out before a function that takes said pointer? Imagine it is any other function besides free, see how ridiculous that sounds?

Talk about a very appropriate domain name lol

I wonder if people think they will be taken seriously with so much hyperbole and drama

> Only then I notice: the driver has been speaking German only.

Oh wow a German conductor in a German train speaking German oh how awkward...

No you were not "kidnapped" your train just stopped at a different station.

> “That’s a different federal state.”

Yes and if you go to many cities in Europe and the US you can walk from one country to another. Oh wow shocking I know /s

Of course this is Deutsche Bahn at its best (in getting hand and feet mixed up) and that compensation is ridiculous. It should at least get your ticket back to the place you intended to go.

Neuwied to Troisdorf is 1h by car or train (in a good day of course)

Because, for the 1384th time, they're pretending they can ignore what the programmer explicitly told them to do

Creating memset_explicit won't fix existing code. "Oh but what if maybe" is just cope.

If I do memset then free then that's what I want to do

And the way things go I won't be surprised if they break memset_explicit for some other BS reason and then make you use memset_explicit_you_really_mean_it_this_time

Yeah the C committee is wrong here

But they're addressing different problems

Sure destructors are great but you still want a "finally" for stuff you can't do in a destructor

1 - Understand the main processes that sales orgs use (MEDDIC or its variations) - you don't need to follow it in all its details but yes in the general idea

2 - Understand what is the problem you're solving and how companies can benefit from it

3 - Understand how companies actually do procurement

4 - Outbound sales are the ones that sucks the most. A rejection is just a rejection, don't take it personally (one part of having actual sales people is being a more impersonal process - they care about the sales but a rejection is taken less personally)

Spallation is the easy part

But neutrons can't go around a tube being guided by magnetic fields

Capsaicin as well

And birds are immune to it

I 100% agree with this

And it's true, while I disagree with a lot of systemd decisions focus has a leveraging effect that's disproportional

Good luck trying to enforce the GPL against a Chinese company

But honestly who in tarnation thought that this would be a good idea?