Same with their ability to summarize and explain things
And their ability to create mathematical objects that are similar, but weird in a funky way, to the actual real objects.
23,273 karma · joined April 13, 2012
Same with their ability to summarize and explain things
And their ability to create mathematical objects that are similar, but weird in a funky way, to the actual real objects.
If he's not getting a cut of this settlement then that's between him and his publisher.
They have the time to write SQL queries in their code
They don't have time to (or better, shouldn't) materialize them as a stored function in the DB
"Oh but your CI/CD should automatically..." Let me stop right there
The time they spend with this can be better used to ship and to improve their SW to customers, not with yak shaving
And if they "do have", they're not spending enough time with their service-market match
- what's APOSD
- "it's illegal since it's copyrighted" makes no sense to me
- The settlement should be exactly to cover their licenses for training
AWS, DigitalOcean for a start
And many others I've used and never bothered me or ask for ID
(And funnily enough the Visa lasts for a longer time)
(And obviously has some doc to prove it)
Sounds like they also don't believe in borders or immigration enforcement, etc
I can't take them seriously
Companies usually know how to handle customers
(Yes some do want to verify the customer for every single purchase - but I usually skip those)
Nope
It's the same deal as you mention above
Yes, and again the "you're holding it wrong" people or "you are not a good enough developer" people will try to do juggling with a chainsaw and lose a couple of fingers in the process
Claude Code's endorsement (and real-world testing) speaks louder than internet discussions that are at this point 30 years old (and probably more)
I don't think "should" is the best word here, I mean it more like "They will (eventually)"
But what they should/are aware of (and work against) is shenanigans by the HW vendors
MS should get all the flack (which is mostly deserved) of this
Manufacturer does whatever crap they want with "it works" and then MS gets the complaints
A driver should only be that. A driver
You can have your billing service billing in the test currency for e2e (and probably with a value that does not match the USD) so you can test "ok this should cost 1 credit so in the end I should have 18 $currency"
Of course. I'm not saying that it doesn't.
Read it again
I'm saying, the conversion to (any) currency needs to be done downstream of the service (to a general billing service). The service needs to bill "credits".
> presume AWS sets its prices in USD, and then converts them to the other currencies using the relevant exchange rate
Yes that's what I wrote in the first post
Nobody is pricing their services in test currency
They are either pricing in $ or in "units" and then converting upstream
This is an even bigger foot gun than what's happening here
Hopefully that was also a family suggestion because I can't think of a more sloppy name than "Microcomputer software"
Also the assurance it won't evaporate one day
An algorithmically "curated" TL, yes that's harder
And you can absolutely get Shingles before 50 (in some cases)
Markets will make you climb a hill ignoring it ends on a cliff end