No, that's not how laws work
Applying laws retroactively is much less common than a "simple" rule change
23,273 karma · joined April 13, 2012
No, that's not how laws work
Applying laws retroactively is much less common than a "simple" rule change
I'm not sure what can help in this case, if it's the tar composition or whatever, but it does look bad
Coming from Windows this is very common
But that want is limited (needs to be), and also it depends on the IC to explain things
They delegate and hire subordinates to do a job. It is by design that the communication won't involve 100% of the work done
You hire people to do a job, not to be a remote controlled puppet
Because (for some reason) you don't have your "standard" keyboard - just the US ISO one
Some keyboards have an extra key (or maybe more than one) and hence can't be mapped fully with a US keyboard
For a good while the default US Intl keyboard in some Linux versions would give a ć instead of a ç for the combination c + '
Makes sense right? Except that made a lot of people angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move
Because Brazilian users were expecting c + ' to become ç
(And they had to use Alt Gr + c instead)
(but yes I do miss those simpler days - but I guess the basics now is making an Arduino flash an LED)
Honestly I don't see much of an use for 10Gbps in a notebook that can't be solved by a dongle when you actually need it
Here's a better idea, a fixed fee for any work. You can buy the license to read a book for $X (for whatever purpose) in RAND terms - of course publisher/material costs go on top, so if you're buying an actual book you're getting the material costs as well - or streaming fees or whatever
Yes and Wikipedia claims it was a "heavily modified" version of the engine
And while I get the tech demo angle, doesn't mean that Quake had to be one of those
Did they really?
Did ID make more money with engine licensing than with game sales?
They needed to ship. I think Quake Engine could wait, and have Doom++ would have given them some slack
This is the opposite to the Boeing problem (shipping the rehashed product instead of the brand new thing)
The average player loses money. Hence the opposite side will make money
Exceptions are dealt accordingly
Maybe because they were actively avoiding civilian targets
And even then mostly because a lot of people were supportive of their cause even if they were against their methods
But it's easy to push to one side or another