>This has a key role in whether individual decisions are cast as a matter of ‘freedom’ versus ‘solidarity’, and regulations as restriction or protection.
A scientist with this type of filter is foremost an activist.
439 karma · joined April 8, 2018
A scientist with this type of filter is foremost an activist.
It stops before July, but the emails and suicide are alleged to occur on the 26th and Sunday the 27th*, which suggests it would be there, even if it took locals time to figure out what happened.
He or the Twitter account supposedly posted the passport to confirm he was a citizen at the time, but that's just what I heard.
* https://archive.md/aMcW4 archive of https://docs.google.com/document/d/12pOhaaFh998B0kyc5Sm4Ihlh...
Take Twitter for example. The elements don't exist until the page loads, and none of the classes have any useful meaning, which makes user styles impossible, and user scripts need to rely on a DOM observer or a timer to find attributes or (even more often) element text to locate some elements to hide or modify.
I see this restated as fact, when the public has no access to its closed beta.
Where is the proof?
But this is a very defensive treatise. A bad look.
This depends on the culture. Mimicking mainstream opinion is not a traditional ideal in many parts of the world, which is why some geographies are underrepresented.
But then, restaurants and other businesses relying on Facebook exclusively to have an online presence (often inaccessible to those with no account) seems like a bad idea to me, but it happens.
But I've already made up my mind on it, and I can assure you not everyone goes along with Facebook.
Because without that and me carrying a computer with a camera, my flip-phoned self has no way to access their electronic menu. Obviously I'm not their audience, and I'm not going to NYC to eat, but does this really work for them?
Not with CSS, their markup is impenetrable. You have to have another site scrape and reformat the content. Shameful.
Verifiable events can be attested to (like the availability of testing) with trustworthy data, like from a reliable reporter or the test providers or some reliable surveillance mechanisms. Using a identity as a proxy for accountability, in furtherance of reputation management -- as the social media web largely treats all this -- is an error.
People aren't reliable just because we know they're people, as Facebook-provided comments on third-party sites demonstrate.
The impulse to identity, by law or platform-specific reputation system, is useful for other ends, but the end of judging books by covers should not be one to strive toward.
Cutting military spending to politicians usually means something else, like cutting benefits to warriors who've already served (thus not really military spending).
From their study link:
>And, the reason most people say that they prefer Mexican Coke is that it contains real cane sugar instead of corn syrup. But according to this Time article, a study done by Obesity journal found that Mexican Coke did not contain sucrose
What does this mean? Last I looked many years ago, Mexican coke has two formulations you can notice *just by looking at the ingredients*: sugar or corn syrup. Did they not look? Did they not trust it?
The taste difference is noticable, because less-refined cane sugar is very tasty.
The social contract was breached from the start.
No citation given. It would have made more sense to use a friendlier project, anyway, like Pleroma.
But no evidence is needed to be outraged by something that hasn't happened yet. Sad!
* https://prospect.org/economy/usps-begins-postal-banking-pilo...
Same as with windows, except all those people who do have knowledge are in no position to improve Windows. They improve applications that run on Linux, instead.
I remember A&W burgers, and they just weren't that great.