424 karma · joined August 1, 2009
The study also indicated a small percentage of treatments evidenced as actually harmful, so that in the end only a third of the treatments were efficacious.
My own experience in a clinical setting showed that most doctors (say, outside a university health system) have trouble keeping up with the research in their field.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/294/2/218.abstract http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/the-ideology-of-hea... (If someone could find a British metastudy containing a nice graph indicating ~50% of current standard medical treatments has no evidence of effectiveness, I would appreciate it - have had much trouble locating it.)
But of course, doctors are not scientists.
Successful: go back and credit Montessori for making me a rebellious, curious nonconformist.
Unsuccessful: go back and partially blame Montessori for those same values, that make navigating this world of rules and structures difficult.
PG's writings would make me think that he leans more towards the Montessori side of things, and probably a lot of HNers are the same. I'm glad jsavimbi spoke about his need for strong discipline.
But a couple months ago I decided to give it another go with Scheme and I have been pleasantly surprised by how much more natural it seems to me. I'm having fun!
I think you may be interested in the older version of economics, political economy. As I understand it, political science is all about analyzing power relationships.
It's only blown up once.
I went out-of-state, then moved back to live at home (HN helped keep me in a wider loop). Relatively unambitious fellow students were the most demotivating part of this.
Look forward to your blog post!
Computer moves always looked unnatural to me, though, and you could often exploit this easily. I'd say most players are at least comforted by lack of computer headway into Go.
I hope to start playing again sometime.
Yet I agree with you, and somehow feel I'm making an improper comparison here. Why?