647 karma · joined April 25, 2012
>women may in fact be better coders
How can someone make such a blanket statement like that with so many confounding variables. Do you think it possible that funding sources and expected (and socially acceptable) results might have something to do with the conclusion these sorts of studies come to? Do you think there are grants available for researchers who would interpret this data differently?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_Iran
>Persecuted individuals are subject to surveillance by the "religious police," harassment, prolonged detention, mistreatment, torture, and execution.
That is a bit of an understatement. Our servers were down every couple of hours for a week, and the attack bounced around to pretty much all of their datacenters.
Or maybe we should stop preoccupying ourselves with this equality of outcome nonsense because in a free market people are allowed to choose their own career paths.
This issue strikes a chord with me because I spent years programming while others called me a nerd. Now that my skills are useful people claim I must be doing well because of my sex and skin color.
It would be common sense if the ToS weren't selectively enforced based on how far one strays from political opinions that Twitter finds acceptable.
Graduates of the top 14 schools per US News and World Report rankings feed into these jobs. Some at lower ranked tier 1 schools end up in big law, but they are typically at the top of the class. I would bet that not a single student of the law school mentioned in the article ended up in with a $160k starting salary.
This was the best salary survey I could find: http://www.lawcrossing.com/article/900045279/1st-Year-Salari...