53 karma · joined May 12, 2019
Even if you didn’t have two car seats it’s unlikely that any of the kids stuff will fit as well. Kids come with a lot of stuff in general.
I bought my Tahoe for $30k, I looked at Tesla but we couldn’t afford the 100k price tag of the model X.
For people who are in lower or lower middle class total cost of ownership is something that you can’t really take into consideration because it’s easy to flex the amount spent on gas by reducing the driving around and being more efficient with your errands, but you can’t flex your payments.
Lastly while 57k isn’t bad for an electric vehicle, it’s still far from affordable for a large portion of Americans.
There product was neat but certainly not revolutionary, they completely missed the mark on understanding the factory automation and controls space.
They only wanted controls engineers to write in a text based scripting language, and required all data to go to the cloud.
I was perfectly clear with them about why I had concerns for the product and obviously didn’t get the job, though now it appears to be hurried in there products page.
I guess they realized what I told them a few years later.
There really isn’t an affordable electric option for people with kids.
I’m not sure what the FDAs play in this is, perhaps they have connections into the states PMP/PDMP programs.
The DEA doesn’t just focus on “illegal drugs” it focuses on all controlled substances, schedule 1-5.
The DEA is actually the one who typically catches doctors for overprescribing controlled substances.[2]
[1] https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/arcos/index.html
[2] https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/crim_admin_actions/index....
At a micro level, the doctors have the same access as pharmacies to know prior drug usage and are the ones directing the pharmacy.
At a macro level, are the pharmacies supposed to work together to combine data sources to find the trends? That sounds like a HIPAA nightmare.
A better approach is to have a government agency watch for trends in drug usage. This is exactly what the DEA is supposed to be doing, so why aren’t they at fault.
Let’s say you have high blood pressure like most Americans. Does your pharmacist also need to check your blood pressure before you can get the meds?
Let’s say you have high blood pressure like most Americans. Does your pharmacist also need to check your blood pressure before you can get the meds?
Two things I've noticed so far that seem odd to me: 1. If you have a preference selected on Sex, open it back up and click off without making a selection, the selection is saved as "no preference," however, on other filters, clicking off cancels the changes.
2. When I selected the top 300 names from 2010, Masculine Only, I expected to see the top 300 Masculine names, but instead, it looks like you are returning the first 300 names then filtering from there.
Also, they are talking about the issue to a more than reasonable extent than what other companies have in the past.
But when your talking about a test being performed on thousands, potentially tens of thousands people per day, you would recoup the cost in no time.