replooda

Pretty sure they couldn't care less whether or not those buying into the IPO are human as long as the money is good.

beharkabashi, you've made us yearn for an article – nay, /the/ article — about the C programming language. Please write it. It doesn't matter how long it takes, as long as you make it worth the wait.

"Prosecutors ... argued Holmes is a reoffending risk, pointing out that she has been advising a biotech startup run by her husband Billy Evans from inside prison."

I really liked your design; not only were the colors to my taste, but, along with the contrast, they were gentle on my eyes; the pixelated font was a nice touch for the code samples as well. On the other hand, while still on accessory matters, I think "Nix: The only sane way to use Linux" would serve you better as a title.

Which brings me to: why Nix, specifically? Wouldn't Guix provide the same benefits — a declarative, reproducible, pinnable system – along with a potentially more pleasant language to code in, namely Scheme?

You find it ridiculous, you find it ridiculous. But saying it's "extreme" to avoid software and seek alternatives is just absurd.

"Free/Open Source Software tainted by LLM developers/developed by genAI boosters, along with alternatives.

"The intention of this list is to raise awareness of AI/LLM usage in popular open-source software. Provided below is an informed set of AI-free alternatives for users and developers to consider should their ethical boundaries be crossed or tolerance for risk be exceeded. This list is not a resource to be used for the harassment of other open-source developers. If you wish to advocate for the cessation of use and/or removal of AI-generated code from another project, we ask that it be done respectfully and constructively."

The repo it links to presents their reasons for tracking and potentially avoiding LLM-supported projects; are all of those ridiculous? Is the technology's track record so amazing as to make the conclusion ridiculous? Or did you mean tar as a replacement to rsync, specifically?

[0] https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware

Could you please elaborate? Maybe because I can't shake a tree on HN without some "I've vibe coded a doomsday device" post dropping, the crypto escrow post didn't immediately scream "forever unemployable" at me.

> 4. Nothing here is guaranteed, including availability, correctness, continuity, or fitness for any purpose.

There you go.

If you ever do, please reply to this with why.

The full title is: "Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says ‘I think we’ve achieved AGI’. He then seemed to slightly walk back the claim." The very first paragraph says the claim was made, not in some press conference or package, but in the Lex Friedman podcast. So, no, unless we are talking Onion, that's not newsworthy, that's just another wolf crying boy yet again. That's an insult to the intelligence.

As to disconnect and self-serving claims, the latter does go without saying, in that, at this point, it should be clear to everyone that those "warning" about AGI-on-the-next-corner or the LLM-powered doomsday happen to be the ones who profit by the technology's being taken as such; as to the former, anyone outside the "circles" such nincompoops belong to would be fired, if not arrested, for doing about 10% of what they seemingly can't blink without doing.

I think he should try surviving on a small-pay job, such as unloading trucks, for a few months, then go back and reavaliate. And mainstream media should stop cosplaying as The Onion whenever one of the clowns says yet another stupidity meant to inflate their stocks.

Thank you. I hope bangkokprop.com will replace it.

Hasn't it?

> Personally, I use the en dash. It's shorter

But not a replacement. It's meant to represent ranges.

Is Facebook the go-to place to look for rentals over there? Or generally, elsewhere?

And every book has the same cover image — — while many have a cryptic, almost (?) random string for the title — latest ThePrimetime's "XQC_algorithims_v7-final.mp4," after a short stint as "Don't click unless your XQC."

I was addressing the concept of developers taking it upon themselves to rewrite the menu (in whatever; React is beside the point) in order not to seem redundant and to pad their résumés.

Come on. Are you an employed developer? If so, even if you have that much power over the flagship product of the company, that you can use it to pad your résumé, do you think the same happens at Microsoft? By all means, the bugs may speak of skill issues (or may not: there's also crunching, mandated AI... Who knows), but the Cloud-first, push-ads, force-account etc. enshittification is the implementation of a vision I doubt was collectively composed by devs, let alone a single dev.

Microsoft Google.

Ohhh, I assumed a paywall. Thank you! What a thoroughly interesting reading that was! Poor Einstein would find all of it preposterous.

Useful. Which saddens my heart.

It doesn't delve into what quantum battery are, unfortunately, other than saying they "leverage properties of quantum mechanics” and "charge faster as they get large" — I'm curious about the practical implications of the latter, should the technology become ubiquitous. Still, quite interesting.

What really hurts is that, ultimately, the initiative derives from and serves the interests of the Island Man Class.

Honestly, it's Brazil. Anything goes. Minister gets mad at Musk? Twitter is blocked, daily USD 10k fine for users circumventing the block. So, despite what you've just read, Canonical was included in their list of companies which need to comply. [0] In short, who knows. I'd say they might have a less dishonest case against Mastodon instances than Ubuntu, though.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47387548

And I've translated its definition of "likely access" here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338260

Related: Kagi Translate now supports LinkedIn Speak as an output language [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47408703

"Millenniales delendi sunt." Now, write it out a hundred times. If it's not done by sunrise...

We don't need to contribute to word inflation. There's "really hard," there's "nearly impossible," there's even "impossible – as far as we know." I don't think it shows a lack of pragmatism to assume a technological claim, made by a technology company, should't be taken at face value. On the contrary, I'd advise more pragmatism to anyone failing to disregard an "unhackable" claim made by Microsoft specially even after fixnum years without known exploits.