Sapir-Whorf is a long discussed issue [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity] and John McWhorter [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McWhorter] is well versed in the background.
877 karma · joined January 29, 2009
Sapir-Whorf is a long discussed issue [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity] and John McWhorter [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McWhorter] is well versed in the background.
It's a good accessible read, mentions a few of the interesting questions zombies can shed light on, and has a fair number of reader comments and responses.
You overextrapolate from an overstated initial cause, and offer no evidence whatsoever for any of your bald assertions.
Here's hoping for the hockey stick.
Rather, they work less than men: "When women executives return to the office, after several months of absence, they typically start to work shorter hours, the study shows: 52 hours per week, compared with an average 58 hours for their male peers, as they adapt to their new double task."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/global/29iht-ried...
This is not brushing away the problem, but pointing out that wages are a symptom of an underlying cause.
A modicum of research reveals that 'The authors reported a correlation of 0.60 between atheism rates and level of intelligence, which is “highly statistically significant.”'
It seems all he does is post dups: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=891137
Randy Mulholland of the webcomic Something Positive quit his job when he received in a month donations that exceeded his yearly salary.
Most webcomics that are 'full time jobs' for the artist also sell t-shirts, taking them a slight step outside of 'pure' donationware, but including these artists, the numbers of successful donationware vendors go up.
What about Red Ryder, way back when, or Toady, of Dwarf Fortress, or the relative legions of successful webcomic artists that live on donations?
He begins with a somewhat spurious statement on how code must be arranged, continues with a complete misunderstanding of what most people mean by scope, and then accuses Python of innumerable memory leaks and associated bugs before he even gets through his first set of comparisons. He claims Python dictionaries abuse the term 'immutable', but they most decidedly never make any such claim. You might learn something about Clojure, but take everything he says about Python with a grain of salt.
(Anyone who is interested in concurrent Python should check out multiprocessing, not threading.)
The unlucky pessimist will stand in line while the lucky optimist will notice that what she needs is easily obtained out of the line.