4,339 karma · joined April 22, 2011
Is this process objectionable to you? If so, why?
It’s also possible I’m simply misunderstanding what you’re objecting to.
I’m one of them.
This seems impressive. Is it, really? I don’t know enough about the subject to judge.
That makes for a very lonely life.
> surprised to find
The surprise has come because what they are thinking is, in fact that expressions of joy make them respect you less. They hide it, but only for so long.
You don’t get to express joy to family or friends or partners. They will have less respect for you.
You do not get to be an adult man and feel joy about anything. You certainly don’t get to express it.
This is great, which means it covers states with income tax as well.
Of course.
With some minor changes, you could make the same argument many, many technologies we use every day, from IPv4 to SQL to C.
Then there is the old saw -- likely apocryphal -- about how railroads are the width they are because they evolved from standards around Roman roads. Even if it is a fairy tale, the moral of that story strikes true: existing tools are built on top of old ones, because it was better to have a standard then even if we may know better now.
Such as? I haven’t seen this attitude you’re claiming to exist.
For example, yesterday I ran into an issue with bundler where a gem was failing to install and needed to step through the process. I set a binding.b in the gem’s extconf.rb, but when that breakpoint got hit the program just stopped without allowing input, I.e. there was no debug prompt presented.
Is bundler running inside a trap context similar to what you mention above?