There is a woeful lack of cyber security acumen in government to actually amp up their hiring practices and strategy.
3,353 karma · joined March 18, 2015
I am a security enthusiastic, tinkerer & retro gamer. Also used to publish free threat feed at https://rescure.me
There is a woeful lack of cyber security acumen in government to actually amp up their hiring practices and strategy.
The key problem is that cyber in government is still very nascent, and security is an afterthought even in policy.
edit : added more details
edit : added more details
https://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/07/the-su...
That apart, since this requires FBS/ chicken cells, not sure if it is going to attract vegans. Pricing is going to be another interesting avenue. Do we have double blind studies if it really tastes like meat or is it just another experiment?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/14/mystery-of-son...
During our experiments, we learnt a lot of lessons -
1) Attackers operate on a budget and are often time-bound (they have bosses as well). They have less incentive to target esoteric ports unless they have specific intel about it.
2) It is always a better strategy to ensure you waste their resources. No one is going to do full port scans of internet. The last I heard, adding an extra port to ZMap takes around 500 MB of extra memory.
3) The advent of intel sharing models typically highlight nasty scanners like a beacon.
4) Very few ISPs provide high bandwidth pipes to their retail (or even privileged) customers do full port scans. Its always a fight between scanning via low bandwidth pipes via multiple nodes over a long period of time and have less updated data or having to pay a lot more to get a 10GB+ pipe to do it which is bad for OPSEC.
5) Corollary to previous point, even if you control a large botnet that may do it for you, you will get reported or will have scanning, co-relation or computation issues. Or all of them.
6) Pareto's principle is everywhere, 20% of security/ sanity measures will solve 80% of your problems. Simply changing network ports, running your infra over a closed VPN environment, reducing your public internet exposure, configuring dual factor authentication et al - it seriously reduced our infra monitoring/ management upkeep.
7) The internet is full of spam (and water is wet), expect mass spam all the time on your mail sensors/ email IDs. Interacting with these will eventually get elevated to targeted attempts. Even simple browsing will sometime give you a high value malware payload served via AD networks that was previously unknown.Jokes apart, if this is true then what is the legitimate use case for Facebook for getting access to router? This may be potentially used for ad fraud, DDoS, surveillance etc all of which have potential penalties. I wonder if they have added another clause in their ToS that they may use auxiliary mediums/ channels/ network devices to collect data so that they can improve customer ad delivery experience.
Now that you mentioned it, I believe you guys have been imbibed with years of valuable experience, it is an absolute pleasure to interact with your team.
It's not DNS. There's no way it's DNS. It was DNS.
1) Vodafone : I pay around INR 588 (~USD 8) for an unlimited calling plan with 200 GB data per month, unused data is credited to next month. Speed varies around 4 Mbps - 32 Mbps, throttles some websites such as BBC/ NYTimes and torrents (no idea why). Streaming services work flawlessly.
2) JIO : I paid around INR 599 (~USD 8) for 84 days with unlimited calling + 168 GB high speed data (downgrades to 64Kbps post exhaustion). Speed varies around 3 Mbps - 24 Mbps. Also throttles some websites as per Department of Telecom (DOT) guidance.
I manage my servers, download abandonware games (which were cool in circa 2000s), code and use streaming services - so far so good. Other providers provide similar offerings as well. The only challenge so far has been to keep my cellphones constantly charged.
Edit : added country details.
I kind of stopped playing after MGS3 - tried MGS4 but it deviated too much from its roots. MGS5 is just okay but since there is no David Hayter so not a true MGS for me.
The first time I fought against Psycho Mantis, I simply marveled the genius behind the fight. MGS2 was way ahead of the curve in almost of all of the aspects - smart texturing work, AI squad tactics, pinpoint pointer shooting accuracy, the still amazing weather effects, cue to the future of information warfare and fake news, VR missions, realtime cutscenes which I can't believe were possible on PS2 during its early stages, the score by Tappy/Harry Gregson Williams/ Hibino, superb VR missions, crisply written dialog and narrative - I still discover something new during my annual playthrough. MGS3 broke grounds by pushing PS2 to its limits, details such as the way the bullets rustle leaves during enemy skirmishes, realtime cutscenes that still hold very well today, probably the best boss fights in the series, great story, score, tight controls and that Hideo Kojima touch. I still remember the fight with The Sorrow, I had no idea on what to do and then I realized - these are characters that I have killed over the course of the game.
Kojima, is an auteur and a master of his craft.
Bonus edit: I recently discovered by accident (epsxe mis-configuration) that MGS1 detects if the player has a monoaural TV set during the fight with Hind D. Video here (not uploaded by me) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzG8Sty9veI