rk06

That project is working towards "mako next" project and is actually talking to vercel devs. So it may make sense to them.

But that is not representative of broader ecosystem.

turbopack is tightly coupled with next.js

rest of the JS community can't use turbopack, so they went with vite

Indian here. UPI (QR code for payment) is huge. UPI adoption is extremely high.

In no-trust society like India, where fake note, torn notes, fake coins can strike anyone. UPI is blessing to most.

icons should prioritize usability first,and design, intersting afterwards.

if your users need billboards, then your job is to make great bill boards

the idea is hackers in state sponsored countries can also root phones and have nefarous intentions.

banking is very risk averse area. and it is good precaution.

what, you mean pushing AI down people throat is not a good idea?

pipelines written in LLMs may be simpler. but they are definitely more brittle and even more non-deterministic.

if AI were deterministic, what difference would different AI model make?

to pump adoption number. it is well known that adoption rate is much higher when people are forced to opt-in be default.

because no one in right mind, would opt-in AI seriously. and definitely never on corporate machine

multiple cursor is basic editor 101.

programmer' text editor need to have it as bare minimum. otherwise, i would have to go to sublime or vscode for text editing and then I will wonder why should I bother with this editor.

because you can gift them to others and ensure that they use it.

same for amazon gift cards

the problem with technical software names is that they are either too long, too pointless, do not die when underlying tool goes through re-incarnation(looking at you angular) or worse, too important to be wasted on a lesser quality project (looking at you react-router).

in my company, we have a tool whose technical name was four word long, and has just as much cognitive load as any technical name.

one of my biggest contribution to that project was to Name it.i gave it a simple name, with zero relation to tech or any software

and suddenly our PMs, Managers, Users can pronounce it and can actually type it correctly and of course recall it's name flawlessly.

so, at least from my experience, having a small, easy to pronounce name is more important than having technical name.

Moreover having a name with all of the qualities is definitely desirable, but there are many projects in world and not that great names. and many Great names (looking at you, Vue.js) are either already taken or beyond my naming skills

i would really like a tv with usb c. so, i can directly connect my phone/ tablet and cast directly

please forgive typos in above comment. i can no longer edit them

nuxt, sveltekit etc don't have RSC equivalent. and won't have in future either. Vue has discussed it and explicitly rejected it. also RSC was proposed to sveltekit, they also rejected it citing public endpoint should not be hidden

they may get other vulnemerelities as they are also in JS, but RSC class vulelnebereleties won't be there

humans can be sued. what about AI? or even a commercial software?

wtf? it can diverge from git?

wasn't git compatibility it's main pro?

there is no difference as jj is only a frontend to git.

author me tions that git cli require multiple steps when there are unstaged changes.

I don't know if git has one liner cli command for it as i myself use gitextn to create worktrees

it means custom roms maintainers like lineageos, can now work on adding android 16.1 builds

the drop of .NET core branding definitely makes it worse. as the other projects(like asp.netcore, efcore) just can't drop "core" from their names on a whim.

in my opinion, they should have kept "core" branding, but shortened it to ".NET" for marketing and only for marketing.

in a better world, Microsoft would ditch the name ".NET" altogether and invent a new one. like LVM (lightweight virtual machine)

No, you are not alone.for non-tech population, it may make sense that .NET 5 is continuation of .NET 4. But the tech crowd knows .net 5 is to .net 4 is what angular 2 is to angular 1.

With .net 4 still in active use, the naming makes it harder

vue allows other languages in .vue files for both css & html similar to js

better, US can move essential services to a separate budget and keep it away from this shutdown nonsense.

you mean very intelligent and very smart people used to do it in their head without computer or calculator

these days only idiots would do so on pen and paper only

but next's dx is no longer good. vite has much better dx, the proof lies in the number of vite based frameworks in the post

When react came out, it was much faster than its competition. but then others learned from react and improved upon it.

however, React didn't copy from others, so it got slower than "competition"

people underestimate the size of JavaScript community by a lot.

all apps need a js frontend, while there backend can be in Java, rails, python, c#, nodejs etc.

even at number 2, vuejs is likely to have more users than multiple popular backend frameworks combined

Hmm, isn't that the same argument we use in defense of windows and ms teams?

Interpreted languages are not the best choicce for a variety of software. for eg: Vast amount of performance issues in typescript cli boil down to being written in typescript, and team is porting to golang now.

Tools specifically CLI tools, are best written in statically typed compiled languages.

the existence of shady and criminal apps on both apple and android app store proves that their policies are definitely not sufficient and should be focused on first.

I will work for 5 Yeats for 500k