1,316 karma · joined May 5, 2014
£500 a link was paid... a few days later they appeared.
They lasted about three years if I recall right before disappearing for whatever reason.
...is a key two lines to me.
TIL people actually say stuff like that.
It can be much smaller and still get the 'retina' effect, saving load time and bandwidth.
Normal life does not count in the BBC :)
If something is built up as being the point of contact for the most powerful person on earth then the security of the medium is relevant.
"I was hacked" would be a terrible reason for WW3 :)
One G product can affect another it seems.
It is worth bearing in mind that not all sites are reliant on google traffic, so more cash from Adsense at a hit on ranking may mean more £ and zero traffic impact.
"The consequences of the failures were substantial. For the 212 incoming parent orders that were processed by the defective Power Peg code, SMARS sent millions of child orders, resulting in 4 million executions in 154 stocks for more than 397 million shares in approximately 45 minutes. Knight inadvertently assumed an approximately $3.5 billion net long position in 80 stocks and an approximately $3.15 billion net short position in 74 stocks. Ultimately, Knight realized a $460 million loss on these positions. "
No relevance to this aggregator.
However... would you trust payment on a .info, .biz etc names?
Some have more trust than others - Nominet do a fair bit of work in the .UK namespace to build that itself to a trustmark. If only someone was doing that internationally!
Is this common / natural or is there some PR at work?
It was a very low weighted indicator when I did analysis on domains back in '05, has it improved since?
"In 2015, Reframed.TV exceeded investment expectations with no commercial revenue."
No details of the metrics but that itself would be an interesting post considering the staff numbers and investment.
errrr!