Apple intended to ship the Mac with a programming language, a really nice threaded and graphical Basic, but Bill Gates put the squeeze on them.
3,197 karma · joined October 25, 2010
Apple intended to ship the Mac with a programming language, a really nice threaded and graphical Basic, but Bill Gates put the squeeze on them.
Didn't Sam want to create UBI? That's one way!
You're thinking of broadcast radio. Streaming is a fraction of a penny!
> So should they be paid a few pennies every time the LLM spits out a response that "used" that training data?
That doesn't sound unreasonable! I understand that current LLMs have no way to report "this token came from this data" but that doesn't mean it's impossible to build. (Ack: this is a full-on proper dunning-kruger, having not looked into it & having zero knowledge of the field.)
But I think it's probably more reasonable to simply split a % of the service revenue across everyone whose data was used. Or pay an up-fee for ingesting the data in the first place.
Generally, it's crazy to name that some people think it's reasonable for these companies to pay for GPUs and CPUs and electricity to run them but not for the data that's the actual core of their service.
Why not pay authors of the data the LLM has ingested?
On ADB Standard keyboards(M0116) left and right corresponding modifiers are logically indentical and can not be discriminated one another by the converter. This is ADB keyboard limitation, not converter's. Apple Extended keyboard(M0115/M3501) can discriminate them except for 'Command' key.
It was developed in 1990, at a time when Apple IIe was still in
production, which means that Appler is likely the first Apple ][
emulator ever made
Not to be one of those guys, but "][ in a Mac" was from 1985:One suggestion -- the trial is difficult to use if I have a long file, because it won't let me select a file that is longer than 5 min. Maybe let me pick a longer file but only transcribe the first 5 minutes? Most people aren't going to edit their files to accommodate your trial mode.
If one could write generic code, and if the properties of the inked objects were exposed to the runtime (i.e. corner points, stroke/fill colors, rotation, etc.) your app would be really close in functionality to the linked project.
I went last year and there was a smallish number of old 8- and 16-bit computers for sale at vendor booths. (Large numbers of old Macs, if you're into that.)
My job interviews in the 80s and 90s (college summer jobs, or the one time a company tried to get me to leave college for a job) had no whiteboard-coding-style technical skills components, aside from demos of software I'd written and general discussions of implementation details.
One job I interviewed for was at Davinci Email. This was probably 1990-ish? They made a LAN email product that ran on top of Novell NetWare. There were a couple of hours of general interviews, including a lunch on-site. The last interview was with someone very technical, who had printed out a few pages of listings of the obfuscated C contest. He asked me to go through them and tell him what each program would output. I did not get the job.