3,500 karma · joined September 10, 2014
I'm interested in mathematics, scientific computing, data visualization, computer graphics, GPU programming, web applications, AI. I wrote several books on Python for scientific computing.
After a sudden personal event, I decided to devote a large portion of my research activities to the shaken baby syndrome controversy: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402
- Website: https://cyrille.rossant.net
- Email: first name dot last name at gmail dot com
Right.
More seriously, I agree that writing short books or articles is an important skill. Writing long is easy; conveying the same amount of information concisely is much harder. It is also a sign of respect for busy readers.
I constantly find myself asking LLMs to be shorter, more direct, and more to the point, without fluff. They seem to have a tendency to generate endless streams of words.
Just curious what you meant by that?
Remote: full-time or almost full-time
Willing to relocate: no
Technologies: Python, NumPy/SciPy, Jupyter, Django, Qt, C, C++, C#, Vulkan, OpenGL, CUDA, WASM, HTML/CSS/Javascript
Résumé/CV: https://bit.ly/4aZbYTX
Email: hn@rossant.net
As a math/CS PhD and research software engineer in an international neuroscience research lab, I develop a broad range of software for science and data analysis: AI / ML models, GPU graphics and computing, interactive data visualization, high-performance scientific computing, databases, GUIs, mobile/web applications and websites. I co-created the VisPy and Datoviz GPU scientific visualization libraries. I wrote 4 books on scientific Python.
I use LLMs for different research-related tasks and I surely can relate. In the past few months, the latest models have become better than me at many tasks. And I am not an ad.