16,527 karma · joined December 3, 2009
Caveat: almost all of them only listen on a Tailscale network interface, so they are not directly exposed to the Internet.
It's always good to have another agent (sans existing context) review the project for slop and hacks, best practices, security flaws, etc. I usually have Codex do one, and Claude do the other. Hope this makes sense.
- Write good specs into files, usually Markdown.
- Go through the spec files with the agents, have it point out holes and problems, and then update the specs. Go through a few iterations of this and then start your agents on development.
Garbage in, garbage out.
USAF stuck to the "we must use manned aircraft!" mantra for far too long, but even they have conceded now.
For the reply guys: I know there are small caveats to the above.
I would appreciate a solid explanation of which periods and aspects "Make America Great Again" refers to. I can think of a couple ones off the top of my head regarding technical progress, but I'm unsure whether MAGA helps or hinders that progress.
Sure, I'll concede here. I think of "exotic" as "few people/nations understand it well enough" but including the manufacture and tooling seems like a no brainer inclusion.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050196667
The spirit of what you say about the J-58 is true -- it does work like that but it is still "just" an afterburning turbojet.
I personally think the path forward is a turbine -> ramjet -> scramjet architecture for an aircraft that goes zero to hypersonic.
Presumably, an SR-71 successor would use a mix of turbofans and ramjet/scramjet to meet their performance (speed/altitude) goals, depending on whether it would be self-sufficient or use takeoff assist from another aircraft.
See this comment for a quick set of links: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49910639
Normally, the engine itself uses proprietary signaling for its systems internally, but will present a standardized interface to the avionics.
All the aerospace technology I've ever worked with or heard of has a pretty clear (human) engineering lineage. None of the planes you've seen or heard of, or parts thereof, are based on extraterrestrial technology.
I'm assuming that, if this rumor is true, somebody in the Trump campaign forced somebody at NASA to do this out of some misguided nostalgia. My hope is that if they're going to resurrect the Blackbird, they'll at least retrofit modern engines into the thing.
But there are much more modern, cost-effective ways to build very-high-altitude, very-fast aircraft. I'm doubtful that going manned is the right approach. It takes a lot of weight and space to carry a person and the required life support systems. That capacity could be better utilized for more fuel and sensors.
There's better technology that's far cheaper to maintain and operate. And you could potentially get hypersonic, or at least near-hypersonic, performance.
These should have been fixed as of a couple weeks now.
Anyone still seeing Tahoe? If so, please reply with the URL you are visiting.
Citation: I was a NeXTSTEP developer.
Unarguably, the world's technical capabilities have increased by this shift (while decreasing the required technical understanding required of the people managing it). Albeit, with some security implications.
I don't anticipate change until this fresh supply dries up and people start asking why.
As a person who's a solid generalist with over 30 years in various roles, I am completely and utterly shocked at how little foundational knowledge people in "senior" roles possess across a wide variety of technical fields. I'm often treated like some wizard or oracle for knowing things that everybody in the field used to know, I just haven't retired yet.
AI didn't create this phenomenon, it's just the latest (and probably the fastest) iteration of it. I recall another particularly large iteration happened when Windows NT 4.0 Server saw mass adoption. Suddenly, people who were effectively IT technicians were now sysadmins.
Edit: grammar
It's not so much that they're cowardly, it's that they don't have budget for the lawyers to deal even with the bad lawsuits.
That, and the court of public opinion is a thing, and it's not reasonable, and it's powerful. It takes down boards of education, gets leadership wrongly fired, and so on.
That said, next go around, I'm buying a top loader Speed Queen Commercial washer and dryer. The ones with analog knobs.
But yeah, I'd never buy a Samsung appliance and that seems to be universal advice among the clued.
Clicking "Turn off Siri" should still act as the overall switch.
Seems to behave this way on my 27.2 Beta 2 test Mac anyway.
At first, I thought this was a well-written parody. I never had one inkling about this poem or his technical knowledge. I understand what he was talking about because I was around back then and understand and suffered from these gotchas.
And I don't see how your second sentence relates to the first.