But they're not banning Zionist (Jewish nationalist) content, only White natl content. So they're engaging in illegal discrimination due to disparate impact.
192 karma · joined March 12, 2012
> I have seen zero proposed solutions or ways of combating the rise of white supremacists because so far, the market place of ideas has not been successful.
The moderate nationalists like Taylor have been purged from common media. He is equated to the exact same as the shooter.
After a Muslim terrorist attack we all call for moderate Muslims to help engage in dialog to talk radical ones out of violence. But in the case of nationalist terrorism that is no where to be seen.
If you ever listen to interviews of former nationalists, dialog is what got the to change their position. Not once did no platforming or throwing bottles at them work. There was an interview with one on CNN last week about this.
What about forcing companies to offer housing to people they do or don't like?
And what about offering loans? Should companies be forced to offer loans to people, even if they don't want to?
When comparing nature vs nurture it's going to be always nature. When comparing total trait variance, the genetically explained variance is on average 50% (averaged across all traits).
A fraction of the remaining 50% is non shared environment (randomness) and a minute/neglible amount is shared environment (nurture).
And about evolution, also wrong. We have evolved 100x faster in the past 5000 years than in the Pleistocene.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_10,000_Year_Explosion
People like to believe in falsities like yours because they don't want to admit than ability is mostly innate and there's nothing we can do about it.
> Youtube’s copyright strike system errs on the side of the entity making the copyright claim.
Youtube is required by law to do this, else they lose their DMCA liability protections.