957 karma · joined October 1, 2016
- Built in GPS for location tagging in photos(a few cameras have this but for many you need an external dongle attached to the camera)
- Automatic backup of photos to cloud/network storage locations
- built in flash storage for redundancy
- Wifi that isn't trash so you could transfer photos at a meaningful speed
- LTE for the same reason when on location
- Run apps for upload to a variety of services
- More computational photography features
> I fear that using any of these will automatically attract hate and disdain to my project, dooming it from day 1.
A lot of people here will feel that way unless your project is MIT/GPL/a blessed OSI license from the start. Its basically impossible to please them unless you do this, so you need to chose one or the other here. I will say a lot of the distain is due to projects changing their licenses later on (aka a rug pull), rather than from the start.
- A lot of companies and startups can get by with a few modest sized VPSs for their applications
- Cloud providers and other infrastructure managed services can provide a lot value that justifies paying for them.
Edit: also why the obsession with dedicated hardware and so anti vCPU? For the vast majority of people this is an implementation detail that doesn't matter at all. A lot of that dedicated server is sitting idle.
I'd argue they should have changed things more.
Okta doesn't make device management software, thats made by companies like Jamf. Okta can integrate with them but Okta isn't what manages your laptop at all.
> I wasn’t willing to use Okta’s login system if I have my own personal passwords or keys anywhere on my work computer.
Do not do this, its not a personal device.