293 karma · joined March 17, 2022
Based in Seoul, Korea
https://sbinnee.github.io/
This got me thinking why I have not tried Jujutsu yet (which was mentioned in the episode briefly) even after I saw it multiple times on HN over the years. It is probably because it just looks like another Git, maybe a less complicated one. But nonetheless it's going to be Git-like, and I know enough about Git and am competent with it. So there is little incentive to learn and try another Git-like tool.
I would love to try a VCS vastly different from Git. But it cannot be just different, it should be better than Git. That, I think, is hard to come by.
By the way, if anyone is interested which podcast I am talking about, this is the episode. "The Real Problems w/ Git" on ThePrimeTime. https://youtu.be/t6qL_FbLArk?si=GOkixm86rFADoc4x
To me it seems it’s related to the specialist-generalist point that it’s easier to focus on one thing rather than to do all the chores you face in SME environments.
I personally use all three major OS, Mac at work, Windows for gaming, Linux for everything else. For me different OS serves different purposes and gives me task-oriented productivity boost.
I checked my git-log from my dotfiles. It says I installed hyprland 2023-07-23.
> 319649c 2023-07-23 (sbinnee) install(hyprland): wayland wm tag: hyprland
I used to run i3, dwm, bspwm (my favorite on X11) and tinkered with other wms. Since this commit, I have been full-time on Wayland. When Hyprland were young, it certainly had rough edges. But these days I don't feel overwhelmed even when I update several releases at once. It is stable and just works. The creator of hyprland, vaxry, is an incredible developer and maintainer. He's made so much progress on usability of Wayland.
It seems that it's all because that users can get thinking traces from API calls, and OpenAI wants to prevent other companies from distilling their models.
Although I don't think OpenAI will be threatened by a single user from Korea, I don't want to go through this process for many reasons. But who knows that this kind of verification process may become norm and users will have no ways to use frontier models. "If you want to use the most advanced AI models, verify yourself so that we can track you down when something bad happens". Is it what they are saying?
People knew that gpt5 wouldn’t be an AGI or even close to that. It’s just an updated version. GptN would become more or leas like an annual release.