2,397 karma · joined January 14, 2009
Some use doubly-fed induction generators which take about 1/3 of the power through an inverter at variable frequency back through the rotor to create stable 50 or 60 Hz output (Type 3 machines), while others do full scale conversion (Type 4 machines)[1].
FERC 827[2] details the power factor requirements in the US for non-spinning (mostly renewable) generators, most easily summarized as power factors from 0.95 lagging to 0.95 leading at the high side of the transformer in the project substation.
[1]: https://www.esig.energy/wiki-main-page/wind-turbine-technolo...
[2]: https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/RM16-1-000....
This means if grid voltage drops they will provide VARs to increase voltage, and vice versa. They can similarly react to shifts in grid frequency. Only after they reach certain power factor, voltage, or frequency limits will they disconnect from the grid, similar to other generators.
If in spain renewable energy projects were somehow exempted from needing to provide a wide range of power factor capability then yes this would be a rules problem.
They charge more for inductive loads because of low power factors and significant VAR consumption yes, though you can also do power factor correction on induction motors. And though most wind turbines use induction generators, they are designed to be able to supply power at unity power factor and through a large power factor range.
Also, islanding means operating as a standalone grid, which does not happen when the generators shut down, and systems are designed to shut down after a certain number of cycles without grid. This does not sound like islanding at all.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59214544
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-arrest-miscarri...
https://churchandstate.org.uk/2015/01/conservative-dream-com...
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/06/health/miscarriage-criminal-c...
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2025/04/02/law-pregnancy-...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-increasing-risk-of-cri...
Others will probably have better model recommendations, I am using Mistral and Gemma myself.
The rest is just a bunch of BS anecdata that definitely does not tell the story the author wants it to tell. The chart is sorted by battery life rather than date which really muddies the picture. Looking at the dates I don't see "the decline of battery life" but rather "battery life is highly variable but devices are getting more efficient as they get more powerful".
Progress in the last 4 years (through mid-2025) shows this post has aged poorly even if the premise had been supported by the data. Many handhelds gaming devices get over 6 hours continuous play, and several like the Odin 2 have larger batteries and can get 10-12 hours easily. And they can be recharged from typical USB chargers.
The article talks about not wanting to give more of your personal data and yet advocates for getting a passport or passport card... So, do the same basic thing and share the same basic data with the same basic government? What principle is being upheld again?
"Just use your passport", sure if you have one. That's fine. Passports are the gold standard. But not all Americans have them, they need to be renewed, they are anything but free, and they take time and effort to obtain.
And the end of the article, with the author acting like they're clever for using their passport at the airport? TSA agents see them all the time, like every day all day. Of course it's fine.
Paid: BBEdit
Free: Kate, after jumping through Apple's ridiculous "unknown developer" nonsense to approve it to run.
A similar (slightly older) laptop I own boots from fully off to the KDE desktop in 25 seconds total including typing my password.
And if it does and I'm completely wrong, this concept is probably doomed anyways, as it is swinging far too far to the other side away from fancy tech and right into uselessly bare. I'm sure a few people are excited by this, but realistically it will have a tiny real market. Nearly no one wants manual windows and leaving them out isn't saving huge amount of money.
Make it comparable to a decent conventional vehicle, but electric, and you may do well. This though is more useless and non-functional than my old Jeep, which has a trip computer and bluetooth as the biggest "tech features".
I see no reason to keep reading. I regret having started.
Anyone who has ever worked at a big company knows this is bullshit. I think people would prefer to not be lied to like this.
2. This is about "VPNs" which are not true Virtual Private Networks but more anonymizing or semi anonymizing gateway services.
I use a WireGuard VPN to connect to services at home from my phone that I don't want on the public internet, and that is an actual VPN in the classic sense. And in this use case I don't want all traffic to go through it because that would be annoying. VPN infrastructure was designed with this case in mind and this paid service approach (do you really trust it?) is just piggybacking on the technology.
This needs a real license too, the "free for personal use" statement in the README is not really an actionable license, and I wouldn't be comfortable building anything important on it.
As for RPN, it's one of those things I didn't get until I was in my 30s and started using it. Then used it more. And now I'm at the point where using a "normal" calculator is a frustrating experience. I got very used to the stack and having intermediate results. I find it highly frustrating that the windows calculator still doesn't have it as an option, and that when asked about it the developers seemed confused why anyone would want it.
Free42 has filled the gap though.