HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

scottjad

848 karma · joined March 22, 2010

submissionscomments
scottjad··on Federal Government Begins First Shutdown In 17 Years
I'm not arguing the position, I was providing a few examples where people can reasonably disagree with the story that was presented as obvious and definitive and educational.
scottjad··on Federal Government Begins First Shutdown In 17 Years
So like 1% of the Federal government (by spending, just making this number up) is going to be closed.

National parks, EPA, WIC, and Housing and Urban Dev.

99% of the federal government (by spending) will remain open, including:

US Military, Food stamps, Unemployment benefits, Social Security benefits, TSA, air traffic control, border patrol, Federal Reserve, and the Post Office.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2013/09/30/227884483...

scottjad··on Federal Government Begins First Shutdown In 17 Years
What has surprised me about this issue is how so much of the media has automatically adopted the Democrats narrative (especially on point #1, see below). Surprisingly, the media stories covering this shutdown are actually pretty fair in their summary (at least with respect to point #1).

The Democrat narrative has at least three elements:

(1) The House Republicans are unwilling to compromise and will shutdown the government if they can't get rid of Obamacare. (2) This will ruin the economy. (3) America should pay its bills.

So much of the media has ignored the Republican narrative:

(1) Senate Democrats and the President are unwilling to compromise and will shutdown the government if they can't keep all of Obamacare. (2) Excessive government spending hurts the economy. (3) Going deeper into debt is not paying ones bills.

Like I said, surprisingly the latest blurbs about the shutdown actually focus on Congress as a whole not being able to compromise and come to an agreement instead of focusing only on the GOP or Tea Party.

scottjad··on Federal Government Begins First Shutdown In 17 Years
This is basically argumentation by story. You told one of many possible stories as if it was obviously and indisputably true. You provided no support for it. What about all the other plausible stories that you ignored?

What if these "stabilizers" (i.e. money creation) are doing more harm than good, or even causing the business cycle? What if social safety hammocks decrease growth? What if welfare provided by prudent local governments through savings, or even private means, are sufficient? What if there are a ton of differences between the Europe and America other than the Federal Reserve?

scottjad··on Java to Scala converter
This is just a simple front-end/demo. The real work is being done by a separate project at https://github.com/mysema/scalagen.

I kind of wished this site was written in Java and run through scalagen with the output being run as an additional meta-demonstration.

scottjad··on Why are Americans giving up their citizenship?
One thing not mentioned in the article, "Renunciation of U.S. citizenship was free until July 2010, at which time a fee of $450 was established."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renunciation_of_citizenship#Uni...

scottjad··on Using GNU Stow to manage your dotfiles
My main problem with this is it leads to accidentally executing git commands on your dotfiles repo.

Like, say you thought ~/src/xulrunner was a git repo, but it was actually managed with hg or maybe was extracted from a tarball. Whereas normally executing some git command would complain that this is not a repo, if your ~ is a git repo then git will happily execute whatever you told it to on your dotfiles repo.

scottjad··on Why Wal-Mart Will Never Pay Like Costco
CEO earnings are generally much more extensive than just the salary (I'm not judging, just saying). This link seems to indicate that the compensation was maybe $4.8 million (basic compensation fiscal year 2012) to over $10 million (options, WARNING I'm not sure how to read these so just addding all of them together)

http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=...

scottjad··on Bradley Manning's Post-Sentencing Statement
Libby didn't do time. His sentence was commuted by Pres. Bush before it started iirc.
scottjad··on Google Reader alternatives
This is why I like RSS to IMAP solutions. Plenty of native and web apps for every device.
scottjad··on Soylent Campaign
My favorite green smoothie (lacks protein, I'll have to try the pea protein):

2 large handfuls of fresh spinach or kale, 1 apple or 6 strawberries, 1 banana, 1 tbsp ground flaxseed, 1 large handful of ice, 1-2 cups of water, 1/4 cup unsweetened almond milk

I prefer to drink it with a straw.

scottjad··on [dead]
Spoiler alert. Don't read if you want to read Atlas Shrugged.

Galt, arguably the biggest hero, is not a C-level exec. He is an engineer. Another hero, Ragnar, is a pirate.

scottjad··on [dead]
What portion of a tax is paid by consumers is not so simple. It is generally thought to be determined by the slopes of supply and demand curves. The term to look up is tax incidence. There is a fair amount of debate about who really pays corporate taxes.
scottjad··on Peter Thiel - You are Not a Lottery Ticket [video]
Maybe look at Mises on entrepreneurship or John Mackey (of Whole Foods) in Conscious Capitalism for deterministic optimism in libertarian framework.

Perhaps "Atlas Shrugged" contrasts both indeterminite pessimism (the failing state and despair-filled question "Who's John Galt?") and the determinite optimism of engineers/makers and Galt's Gultch.

scottjad··on Security incident update
What isn't in this post:

- Any mention of the claim that they had made a deal with the hackers. No attempt to deny the claim.

- Any mention of when the systems were compromised or when they discovered that they were compromised. The post starts with "Yesterday," mentions working "around the clock" and mentions Friday, giving the impression that this is all very recent, when according to the hacker Linode has known for two weeks.

scottjad··on Ask HN: Why would a government have created bitcoin?
Tax evasion.
scottjad··on A new Light Table experience
Thank you!
scottjad··on It’s the Sugar, Folks
I wondered the same thing. For the most important variable in their study they sure don't explain it very well.

I looked all over FAOSTAT but couldn't find an explanation. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html#METADATA

scottjad··on A new Light Table experience
How are you highlighting the matching characters in the fuzzy search results?

http://www.chris-granger.com/images/030/navigate.png

It looks like the same method I'm using in emacs/ido, which is to turn "la/clj" into

  "(l).*?(a).*?(/).*?(c).*?(l).*?(j).*?"
I've found this technique gives inferior results to whatever SublimeText is doing. For example, in your hits with "langs", such as "lt/objs/langs/js.cljs" I think "lt/objs/langs/js.cljs" is more intuitive than the result you give of "lt/objs/langs/js.cljs". (Sorry for the hard to read italics)

For another example, on a search of "completions" I think your technique will highlight "hacks-completions" as "hacks-completions" instead of "hacks-completions".

Does anyone know if there's an easy way to modify the regex (not LightTable) and get the user-friendly results of Sublime Text?

scottjad··on My new medical research startup launches today: let me know what you think
From the page titled "Our Scientists, Doctors, and Researchers"

  programmer
  gamer
  mba
  programmer
  student/mathematics
  student/medicine
  md/recent grad
  student/medicine
  econ BA/finance (labeled researcher)
  marine biologist (labeled researcher)
  industrial engineer/entrepreneur (labeled senior researcher)
  econ BA/event planner
  student/philosophy+neuroscience+law (labeled researcher)
  md/recent grad (labeled researcher)
  eagle scout/philosopher (labeled researcher)
  graphic designer
  md/practicioner
  novelist
  phd molecular biologist/recent grad  (labeled researcher)
  programmer (labeled researcher)
  college research assistant  (labeled researcher)
  blogger
  programmer
http://www.metamed.com/our-scientists-doctors-researchers
scottjad··on Leiningen version 2.0.0 released
Someone just fixed it, try again.

https://github.com/flatland/drip/wiki/Clojure/_compare/87336...

scottjad··on Why the Fuck?
> Finally, regarding funding, yes, NIH spends about $31B per year, which is a lot. However, drug companies spend $4B per drug approved[1], which is an incredible amount of money when multiplied across all drugs.

I think this $4B number is the Research & Development line off a financial report. I am not an accountant but I believe this number can include tons of things that people don't normally think of as R&D but just regular cost of doing business, and what we do think of as research is often a very small percent of it. Perhaps tax laws incentivize companies to put as many expenses in this category (of like 3 categories) as possible.

On a related point, people used to quote a number like it cost $500 million to bring a new drug to market, often as a justification for patents. I remember reading an academic article that showed how the real cost was almost always 1/20 of that, but drug companies were including the construction of optional new plants that were used for existing drugs too, 20 year leases on specialty tree farms and other supplies, and huge "present value" calculations that would take $2 million spent by a university 20 years ago, use the companies cost of capital (maybe 14%), and even though the company only paid $500k for the rights a few years ago they would calcuate some number in the tens or hundreds of millions that was never paid by anyone.

scottjad··on All-in-one iPad Mount and Stand
Depends on the person, car, mount location, driving conditions, and what it's being used for. 5" GPS windshield mount hasn't been a problem for me.
scottjad··on Remind HN: Vote
Voting is not a contract. See Lysander Spooner's No Treason: http://jim.com/treason.htm

Specifically:

"In truth, in the case of individuals, their actual voting is not to be taken as proof of consent, even for the time being. On the contrary, it is to be considered that, without his consent having even been asked a man finds himself environed by a government that he cannot resist; a government that forces him to pay money, render service, and forego the exercise of many of his natural rights, under peril of weighty punishments. He sees, too, that other men practice this tyranny over him by the use of the ballot. He sees further, that, if he will but use the ballot himself, he has some chance of relieving himself from this tyranny of others, by subjecting them to his own. In short, he finds himself, without his consent, so situated that, if he use the ballot, he may become a master; if he does not use it, he must become a slave. And he has no other alternative than these two. In self- defence, he attempts the former. His case is analogous to that of a man who has been forced into battle, where he must either kill others, or be killed himself. Because, to save his own life in battle, a man takes the lives of his opponents, it is not to be inferred that the battle is one of his own choosing. Neither in contests with the ballot — which is a mere substitute for a bullet — because, as his only chance of self- preservation, a man uses a ballot, is it to be inferred that the contest is one into which he voluntarily entered; that he voluntarily set up all his own natural rights, as a stake against those of others, to be lost or won by the mere power of numbers. On the contrary, it is to be considered that, in an exigency into which he had been forced by others, and in which no other means of self-defence offered, he, as a matter of necessity, used the only one that was left to him.

"Doubtless the most miserable of men, under the most oppressive government in the world, if allowed the ballot, would use it, if they could see any chance of thereby meliorating their condition. But it would not, therefore, be a legitimate inference that the government itself, that crushes them, was one which they had voluntarily set up, or even consented to.

scottjad··on Remind HN: Vote
How private forms of several of the things you mentioned can work:

"The Machinery of Freedom" by David Friedman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o

scottjad··on Remind HN: Vote
The only way your one vote has any chance of determining a US presidential election is if you sit on the US Supreme Court.

Anything within a few hundred votes will be decided by the courts. See Gore v. Bush.

"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." (Joseph Stalin)

scottjad··on HappyEdit: A Vim-inspired, modern, open source text editor
Included in that million lines of code are two maybe three email clients, two IRC clients, org-mode (~100KLOC itself), tetris, and who knows what else.

I agree with your point, just not that the Emacs code base is a good reference of what's required to implement the numerous little text editing features people use every day.

scottjad··on Show HN: After a couple of months playing with the Reddit API, I built this...
Please add rel=”next” and rel=”prev”.
scottjad··on Web Design is 95% Typography
> 95% of the information on the web is written language.

Really? Youtube videos, Facebook photos, TV shows, movies, music, etc only 5%?

To be expected from a company that sells a text editor that's 95% typography.

scottjad··on Former “Seasteaders” Come Ashore To Start Libertarian Utopias In Honduran Jungle
One book that tries to quantify along several dimensions is "Democracy: The God that Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order" by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Here's my notes from a related talk he gave on the subject:

http://library.mises.org/media/The%20Costs%20of%20War/World%...

"in europe, during monarchy taxes were 3-5%, during democracy 25%. during monarchy debt was paid down during peace time, democracies increase debt during war and peace. during monarchy, price level fell century after century, and in democracy price level has risen. in monarchy interest rates fell, in democracy interest rates have risen. in monarchy money supply grew modestly (6x in century), in democracy it's grown enormously (1000x in century). govt gdp expenditures are much higher under democracy than monarchy. very little redistribution of wealth under monarchy. very little interference. very few new laws. most wars are limited to territory under dispute often bc of inheritance/marriage."

← PreviousPage 4 of 7Next →