375 karma · joined May 26, 2008
Cool, thanks for that incredibly insightful observation, marshray.
The best part about your original question is that it can be answered provably in only one way — the one you want. So given your patronizing tone and thinly veiled elitism, I'll happily take the side of the argument that you would force me to prove through induction, for the simple satisfaction of calling you out.
>Markup Shows Strong Support for SOPA (12/16/2011)
>SOPA Has Strong Support (12/15/2011)
>Smith: Critics Continue to Spread Lies about SOPA (12/14/2011)
This is about as divorced from reality as you could possibly get. If this country is not the definition of a corporate oligarchy I don't know what is.
http://basho.com/blog/technical/2011/03/02/Mathias-Meyer-has...
So in other words, the latest web technology will always be lagging behind. Yeah, that's pretty obvious.
But the sad thing is we're comparing two already horribly flawed systems. No one in their right mind should be arguing in terms of a locked-down, Disney-fied, compartmentalized experience versus a slow, infuriatingly clumsy and intermittently-available simulacrum of the same thing. We need to own our own devices and create, modify, and deploy our own software on our own terms. (And please don't insult my intelligence by claiming that the ability to browse to any given URL can constitute these freedoms in any materially useful way.) To publicly ask for anything less is so lacking in imagination and ambition as to be criminal; it serves only to reinforce the pathetic productivity-destroying dichotomy seemingly being forced upon us.
The built-in notifications and delegate-relationships handle everything else (updates & synchronization) automatically. This is actually NeXTSTEP-level stuff that's been around for decades.
Yep. Not to mention that, in paying for the service, you become the service's customer. The relationship with a free service is much murkier; instead, you are often its product, and the company has an incentive to manipulate you and breach your trust.
Oh, so is that like having freedom from porn now?
And even if that weren't the case, unions have every right to fight for the interests of workers, and should do so at every available opportunity.
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Linux-system-squishes-into-Ethernet-connector/
http://pwnieexpress.com/
http://www.gumstix.com/
http://www.raspberrypi.org/From the dictionary: Elitism is "the advocacy or existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society."
A society that favors the elite individual above all else is by nature hierarchical, exclusionary, and anti-democratic. Elitist societies by definition disempower the majority for the enrichment of a few. And as per the definition of "society" — "the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community" — elitism is an absolute failure.
Your attitude epitomizes this online community, and that's not a good thing. Frankly, it's pretty repugnant.
And in an unrelated point, a good companion to this article is Being Poor:
Oh, if only it weren't for all those undeserving, greedy workers! Clearly the problem is that they banded together to protect each others' wages, access to medical care, and dignity in the workplace! Thank goodness we have Businessweek to confirm our reactionary free market biases for us.
You guys must be loving these budget crises — they provide such a convenient pretext for attacking worker's rights and consolidating the power of the owning class while sidestepping the inherent contradictions of the system which caused those crises at the outset.
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/...
If you make no changes to your application, then the OS won't touch it. And if you do decide to support sudden termination, then hopefully you would call disableSuddenTermination before starting any background file transfers, renderings, etc.