Sure, but will they agree to actual terms? Terms that Israel won't instantly reject?
2,046 karma · joined November 14, 2010
Sure, but will they agree to actual terms? Terms that Israel won't instantly reject?
I don't think you can get much stronger than "bragged about it on tape".
No, people just constantly assert that other cultures are better and that Americans should adopt their values instead.
I have enough shit to do in the morning, and I'm not waking up earlier.
But really, why? Why can't America just do things the American way? Why do people reject the idea that Americans are allowed to have their own culture?
That's not great when their target market is gamers, a large number of whom distrust facebook, love valve, hate the idea of a VR device trying to become a walled garden, and are generally entitled jerks who will whine and cry and talk about how they are never buying an oculus product because palmer lied about the price/sold out to facebook/whatever.
How is USB not a fantastic answer to the problem you described?
Ever increasingly cheap and plentiful clones made computers finally cheap enough for anyone to own?
Phones are already way beyond that point.
> where if a user needs more ram he would just add more, if he needs a new processor he would just replace the current, if he needs a higher resolution display the old just would get replaced.
Why would I ever want to deal with that?
No one wants to deal with that. Just works is way better than endless tweaking.
No it fucking won't.
TN you can do it, but it's messier.
Just how much do you think they should be paying?
> Look at the job descriptions on the H1B disclosure sites...those are all just regular jobs in Silicon Valley anyone would do for the right money...
and they hire loads of Americans as well. They hire people who pass the interview.
IIRC the top 10 were all consulting companies the last few years. You can look at the pay rates vs google/MS/etc... and see the difference. You can also look at the number of green card sponsorships.
It's really awful.
Go doesn't have generics because they don't want them.
No, the former results in a bloated code base full of old legacy crap that no one understands and is afraid to touch because it might break. You have to insert weird workarounds because that bug is now a feature to some idiot and you provide backwards compatibility so it lives forever now.
This is institutional failure.
Next year will the be the "year of the linux desktop".
I should probably update things.
RMS a nag? No way, I can't possibly believe that.
Now they move slow with broken things.