575 karma · joined January 13, 2010
Australian company Nearmap started with exactly the same goals and have a similar product (custom aerial photography system with automated processing), but they don't seem to have figured the 3D photogrammetry part out yet.
Pretty expensive though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maguire_v_SOCOG_2000 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HREOCA/2000/31.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HREOCA/2000/49.html
I fully expect a future version to do the security-critical stuff on a remote server, which would allow the application to work without a secure element but with a slower transaction time.
You have to use Azure Storage, which isn't that much of a problem because the whole service is very similar to Amazon's offering - I was just able to modify existing S3 code. The pricing is also about the same, but what Azure CDN has over CloudFront is a greater number of edge locations, most notably in Australia and South America. I'm really happy with their Asia/Australia performance.
Interestingly, the Azure CDN servers claim to run "EdgePrism", like LimeLight, although they seem to be hosted by Microsoft themselves.
Do you really not see how abhorrent it is to be inconsiderate of other people? It may not be passive-aggressive but it's certainly rude.
I think this would be an awesome open source project!
It's not clear who owns it, though, so don't just go and use it. My point is that it's worth spending the time (and maybe money) to find one of these databases to make your international customers happy.
Twitter's limit is 140 Unicode characters, which is subtly different from SMS's limit of 140 bytes (160 7-bit characters or 70 UTF-16 characters).
The fact is that it is extremely difficult to implement any multimedia application without running afoul of a patent. Rational developers will pick the safest option, and that is to license the MPEG patents, which (I believe) also offers submarine patent protection in that the MPEG-LA would be solely liable for not finding them earlier should trouble arise.
The good news is that these patents are not enforceable worldwide, and the first of them should start expiring (if they haven't already) within the next few years.
That said, after reading the claims of a lot of the other patents Apple is citing it is apparent that they are complete rubbish, for example [2] (the observer pattern applied to a desktop environment), [3] (generic proxy objects for IPC/RPC - Smalltalk/CORBA did it), and [4] (WTF???????).
1. http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/C...
2. http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=zIwLAAAAEBAJ
If Apple sues Google, Google will stop paying Apple for Safari search ad revenue and make iPhone users hate Apple by blocking Maps and YouTube and breaking iPhone Mail's Gmail button. I'm sure Apple wouldn't want that.