39,256 karma · joined November 30, 2010
Founding Partner, Fifty Years (http://fiftyyears.com/). Former founder now supporting founders making something civilization needs (climate, synthetic biology, food tech, health, etc).
Twitter: @sethbannon
I write at http://sethbannon.com
YC Badge: 0x84462476fc2833f1f0e72417c82bd719522b0ebf
The climate is heading off a cliff. Thousands die every day of malnutrition. Pandemics put the world at risk. Technology entrepreneurship can solve these problems and many more! Fifty Years is a different kind of venture capital firm. At Fifty Years we believe technology entrepreneurship can and should solve the world’s biggest problems and we only support entrepreneurs working to do so.
We're looking for an experienced Recruiter / Talent Partner to both help our portfolio founders find great talent directly and also to help them learn how to build world class talent functions internally. The role will be 50% direct recruiting and 50% coaching founders on how to recruit well -- building pipeline, interviewing, reference checking, closing, etc. Candidates should have experience recruiting at a high growth startups or building a talent function at a VC firm.
This is us: https://fiftyyears.com/
Drop us a line at hello at fiftyyears.com with RECRUITER in the subject line.
"the number of rental applications by people who fall into Gen Z (defined as those born between 1997 and 2012) have increased by 21% in the past year. Meanwhile, as we just discussed, rental applications from every single other generation have been lessening. Millennials, for instance, saw an 8% decrease in rental activity...
Between 2020 and 2021, people who fall into Generation Z were filling out 21% more leases nationwide, as compared with the year before. When that search is narrowed to San Francisco, Rentcafé says those 20-somethings had a 101% increase in rental applications. They now make up more than a fifth of all people looking to lease in SF."
https://sfist.com/2022/03/22/san-francisco-is-getting-younge...
Pretty brave of him.
Gaining 2 seats: Texas
Gaining 1 seat: Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon
Losing 1 seat: California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia
He founded Amazon 26 years ago.
A 1% wealth tax means he keeps 99% of Amazon stock each year.
.99^26 = .77 = 77%
So he'd currently be worth $145B instead of $188B.
PG is saying Bezos would have left the US because of that?
Edit after twitter conversation with PG:
He doesn't believe Bezos would have not started Amazon in the US if there was a wealth tax. He thinks a US wealth tax might marginally reduce the number of founders that choose to come to the US to start a company.
I still disagree.
I think great founders will start companies in the place that maximizes the chance they create an Amazon-level success, not in the place with the lowest taxes.
At some point taxes may be too aggressive but a low single digit wealth tax isn't that.
But, according to the article, "the app doesn’t allow terrorist organizations or support for terrorism, the sharing of false rumors, violent language (what the site describes as 'fighting words') toward others, blackmail or pornography."
Last I was in NYC, "fighting words" were most certainly allowed, as was pornography, as was the sharing of false rumors (most of the time). Seems like he's just drawing a different arbitrary line and trying to claim he's a purist for free speech.
1) Management fees stack from one fund to the next and can add up. The article says their last fund was $38M and that this is their 4th fund. So assuming their first two funds were $20M each (no idea if this is the case), you'd get stacked fees of $20M * 2% + $20M * 2% + $38M * 2% + $40M * 2% = $2.36M / year
2) Often VCs will taper their management fee over time. For instance, they might charge 3% the first two years, and then reduce over time, so the average is 2%. A 3% management fee on just the $40M fund would be $1.2M / year.
3) Sometimes VCs will sell a stake in the management company to fund operations. So if you expect a $40M fund to 3x, and the carry was 20%, then the management company would expect a windfall of ($40M * 3 - $40M) * 20% = $16M. The VC might sell a 10% stake in the management company that's due to received this carry for $1M now, in order to hire staff and fund operations.
Hope this helps!
[edited for formatting clarity]
At the Series A and later, founders typically have to give up a board seat in financing rounds. This is no bueno, because it means they're giving up control of the company. Board members are hard to get rid of, can often veto big moves, and after a certain point can even fire the founder CEO.
Ensuring only extremely trusted, founder friendly, values aligned people make it on to the board should be a top priority of every startup founder.
By accepting a preemptive offer from an investor the founders have worked with directly for months/years, the founders are limiting the risk of having the wrong people on the board. Founders can, of course, run reference checks with other founders on new investors, to try to gauge how they would act as board members, but there's no stand in for direct experience working with an investor.
Given that the most important things to optimize for during later stage financings are ownership and control, it makes sense that founders might trade some ownership to have more certainty about the control situation.
Note: this post is 4 years old so somewhat out of date.
In recent years YC has taken admirable steps to fund solutions to the world's biggest problems (the climate crisis, health, nutrition, etc). Would be curious to hear how you see those efforts evolving!
Glad that new solutions like satellites [1] are coming online to solve this problem.
1: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2019/01/16/twenty-per...
Disclaimer: I'm an investor in Astranis, mentioned in the Forbes article.
I'm convinced industrial animal agriculture will be one of the things today's society is condemned for, fifty years from now.
On the one hand, this is a huge loss for YC. Sam's energy and vision helped herald in YC v2.0. His leadership will be sorely missed.
On the other hand, I'll sleep better at night knowing he's dedicating himself fully to AI safety and the work of OpenAI. There's no one I'd rather have leading the effort to ensure AI development doesn't lead to a dark future.