This might be targeting a minority of users - it’s design for power users. I’d expect HN to be supportive of this sort of design.
593 karma · joined February 11, 2013
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/sethherr; my proof: https://keybase.io/sethherr/sigs/iwabyyucRMsPkHeZgo_Eog23YoB5kMrP2JOWItRZV5o ]
This might be targeting a minority of users - it’s design for power users. I’d expect HN to be supportive of this sort of design.
Also, I don’t trust Australia on encryption.
Seems like a definite win to me? Maybe your usability desires are different than other users desires? In the case of an autohiding header - it doesn't seem like a big reduction in page visibility?
To me, this is better usability. I agree - fixed headers obscure the page and it's bad. But simultaneously, it's nice to be able to access the header and navigation instantly. This seems like a good compromise?
> I do believe she actually thinks she is making the world a better place but in reality any interaction with her has been incredibly stressful having to carefully weigh every move made in her presence.
What if what some vocal minority advocates say is correct, and they have to carefully weigh every move they make, throughout their whole lives? If living that carefully is incredibly stressful, what percentage chance of it being the lived experience of minorities in tech justifies someone fighting aggressively to make things easier for minorities?
Our passenger rail is depressingly subpar.
> WD-40 is an American brand and the trademark name of a water-displacing spray
… and the definition of “water displacing spray” is “penetrating fluid”
It definitely is an oil, it definitely lubricates. But we normally name things by their primary purpose.
Definitely will debate lubricants for days, but no one who is in the industry uses standard WD40
I think the thing that really upsets people is that the company changed course. People who go to work at a HFT firm are probably all motivated by compensation - and would expect that, because it’s baked into the company culture and business model.
People choose to work somewhere based the reward it offers. If that changes, without their consent, it breaks an unwritten contract.
Just because you (or Texas) thinks abortion should be illegal, doesn’t miraculously make the information not part of knowledge other people believe is educational.
Did you all have a change of heart? Just see a product opportunity?
The last company broken up was AT&T; at the time everyone was worried about Japanese electronics companies.
> breaking up AT&T in 1982 was the best thing that could have happened to America. AT&T's core project in 1982 wasn't fighting Japanese electronics companies: it was suppressing the growth of the internet in the USA
> Antitrust enforcement isn't an economic drag, it's an economic STIMULUS
Source: https://pluralistic.net/2020/10/21/each-drop-of-strych-a-nin...
I bet, based on recent history, that most of the upstarts would be from the US. If that isn’t the case, it will be a wake up call and hopefully the US will rise to the occasion.
This has frustrated me for years. The low number and price is crazy, when I visited the Netherlands I stayed in a houseboat and it was amazing and cheap - and there were so many of them.
If you have a guaranteed internal market so you need to launch with scale, then that’s more important
This is the most important line from this comment.
If I'm using blame or bisect, it means I did something wrong.
I merge 10 times a day - and if it takes me a minute, because I'm slower than you - that means it's ten minutes a day. Add the cognitive load of the whole process and the added time of explaining it to other team members - 10 minutes is an underestimate.
I'm going to spend that time writing tests and comments, since even you note that they're the better option.
Squash is good enough. I spend my energy improving the right things.
And that segment is a growing segment.
This seems easier to do than jumping domains.