1,091 karma · joined December 16, 2016
They're only warning that your comments about this accident seem to be politically motivated, so that they should be taken with a grain of salt.
It looks like you're quite interested in pointing out that the culprit of this 2013 accident was the same party which is now in office, but even if we take a look at your sources, it says something different:
"Las víctimas creen que hubo cuatro decisiones críticas. Primero, el cambio de proyecto original realizado por Blanco, que suprimió el sistema de seguridad ERTMS en la vía justo antes de Angrois. Segundo, la decisión del ministerio de Ana Pastor de desconectar el sistema embarcado en el Alvia, desactivando una medida técnica que habría ayudado a mitigar el riesgo de un error humano como el que tuvo el maquinista. La tercera decisión fue ignorar un aviso por escrito de un jefe de maquinistas advirtiendo del riesgo en la curva de Angrois. La cuarta, que Adif y Renfe permitieron poner en servicio la línea sin haber realizado el análisis y evaluación de riesgos que exigía la normativa."
There we can read that not only the former minister Blanco (socialist) was to blame according to the demonstrators, but also Ana Pastor (conservative) whose party was in charge when the accident happened.
Also, it's been four and a half years since the former Transport Minister who is in jail left the office (july 2021).
So it doesn't look the situation in Ukraine was very democratic either.
Depends on where you live. If you are living in North Korea and somehow you got to own a Roomba, it would be surely a bad thing.
But living in a western country, I would hands down prefer giving all my secrets to the North Korean government instead of my own one.
Maybe to have some "basic" auth for an embedded device web interface or something like that? I suppose it's better than nothing. I've devices which prompt for username and password with no TLS either.
What's the process, usually, adding some special ventilation system to the house?
EDIT: after some more thinking I assume the key is that we wouldn't be able to have a variable of type FILE, but a pointer, whose size is always known.
struct _IO_FILE
{
int _flags;
...
so I suppose this means it's indeed expanded somewhere and, thus, not opaque? ...
struct _IO_FILE;
/* The opaque type of streams. This is the definition used elsewhere. */
typedef struct _IO_FILE FILE;
...But OP said it also deletes the message in the server, so it may be a different bug, right?
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-d...
I know it's not the best but at least it can be done with little effort.
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/05/huawei-matebook-x-pro-20...