I know that a lot of it is supposedly not going to make it into the real economy. But if there is one thing for sure, it's that the government is going to behave recklessly and fuck it up.
152 karma · joined February 17, 2020
I know that a lot of it is supposedly not going to make it into the real economy. But if there is one thing for sure, it's that the government is going to behave recklessly and fuck it up.
There is a study that shows in vitro, it helps fight the flu: https://covid19data.com/2020/03/06/meth-may-fight-flu-virus-...
There are also many reports from meth users that they almost never get sick.
Unless we are seeking out what works rather than what is broken all the time, we're going to miss a lot ways to make life better.
Taiwan has also done so. It has a similar story, burned by SARS, also.
Yes, but this doesn't seem too hard. Just have some infected people spit in a cup, and mix it into large vats of raspberry jam and people can then just spread it on their toast on one morning.
Every time we consume we're exporting those little green pieces of paper, you know?
Shrinking consumption actually props up the dollar, because we're giving out less, and the rest of the world, with dollar denominated debt and liabilities, has bills to pay.
Eventually we could move on to having tubes implanted for feeding and waste. You could stay in there indefinitely, forget you ever even existed outside the simulation...
You're talking about a virus, you know... an inert molecule.
I also have a hard time rectifying the idea that you can pay someone to listen to you, and at the same time try and hold the belief they really care about and like you. If they care, why are they accepting money just to listen to you? To accept the premise of psychotherapy, and what they tell you in sessions, namely that they do care, it seems you need to achieve a suspension of disbelief that I never could.
I've always wondered what sort of damage that could do to you psychologically, holding that belief for a long period of time. I mean, the person who you place the most trust in, who knows you best, is also charging you an arm and a leg every week. You paid for their summer home.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-s...
Given the urgent nature of the disease, why would you not try it, even if there is a small chance it could end up saving someone's life?
And do you really believe that Trump, with his approval rating already at an all time high is worried about defeating Biden, who is showing signs of dementia?
And I wrote more prudent, not “suddenly resilient”. Why don't you argue against what I actually wrote, rather then a straw man you made up?
People that do survive would be healthier to begin with. There would be more room, and less pollution.
More research put into medicine would help everybody live healthier lives. The economy would be less ecologically harmful allowing nature to flourish. In San Francisco, wild foxes are already starting to wander through the city. Imagine what it would be like after 20 years of this.
Overall, a much better place.