simonklitj

My almost 5 year old iPhone 12 does all of this. No issues, no pull towards upgrading except for USB-C.

I think most people, my close relatives included, who use LLMs professionally day-to-day do not understand how LLMs work under the hood.

Is this a thing? https://medium.com/hypersphere-codes/randomness-in-css-b55a0...

Robwords has a good video on this article! https://youtu.be/VcekIrFjwe0?si=4rZqHqunKa3epKQP

Really? Worked for me in February. In that case, this workaround might’ve been patched.

Yeah, you can change plans (at no cost), then cancel right after the change. You get 14 days of free cancellation, which resets on plan change.

clever! Thank you.

Interesting read—thanks! One question: in the CoW example, if VM A modifies the data post-fork, what does VM B see when it later copies that data? Does it get the original data from the time of the fork, or VM A’s modified version?

And you can send straight to the Kindle from Calibre via WiFi, no need for /sendtokindle.

That’s not necessarily what was meant though.

“Not inconsistent” is more cautious and less assertive. It allows for some ambiguity rather than claiming perfect consistency.

Yeah, my cousin did this years ago. Wore it religiously too.

I don’t know the details of how it works, but considering the environmental impact of fracking, I’m afraid something like this might have many unwanted consequences.

Yes, these are all very good points. You’ve got me awaiting the future of the tech a bit more eagerly.

Yes, and for NFL. It’s one of my favorite shared hobbies of ours!

I just can’t imagine sitting with a headset on, next to my wife, watching the NFL. It could very well change for me, but it does not sound appealing.

Ah, okay. I think we have different ideas of what constitutes a failed state.

What is the reason, then, that California cannot be considered a first world state, and instead a failed state? And are there other states that used to have this designation, but have lost it in your view? Just curious.

I don’t disagree in principle. But people also have to look at the interface while using it. There’s a balance, for sure, but strict utilitarian design is a no for me.

Calm down man. That comment was a solution to a problem, not a defense in any sense. Yikes.

I don’t think NavinF shows any lack of concern for the issue as such. What’s being talked about here is whether OpenAI’s being forthright concerning their motives for keeping the tech closed.

I think we can all agree it is valid to be cautious with some of this tech, but the question is whether OpenAI is being cautious or simply using caution as PR. And given their track record, the latter seems, if not likely, then possible.

This is an interesting comment to me! How do you define secular-looking? Is it a lack of some particular design element?

Thank you! Didn’t even bother to read it when it wasn’t immediately clear what SLC means.

You are going beyond the constraints, “if our communication with a 7-year-old child were limited to the level we achieve with crows.”

We know we are able to teach children language because we have shared modes of communication through which we can observe their learning; speaking, writing, hand gestures.

> You do not need to share a language to teach a language

True, but I would argue that you need to share a mutually intelligible mode of communication.

How would you teach (and know that they have understood it correctly) the concept of monetary denominations to a 7-year old child if you were limited to communicating on the level you can with a crow? I have no idea, and would probably give up. But this does not necessarily tell us anything about the intelligence or capacity for learning language in the child, it tells us only of the gap in communication that we cannot bridge.

> so animals at least doesn’t have the same level of language intelligence as humans do.

This does not necessarily follow. What follows is that humans are not able to teach animals human language on the same level as they are able to teach humans.

Is this more of a limitation of our ability to communicate with the animals? If we could talk intelligibly with a crow, maybe we could teach it? Conversely, if our communication with a 7-year-old child were limited to the level we achieve with crows, could we teach the child and know for sure that they understand it?

Understandable, I’m in the desert southwest, so not a concern here.

I did recently attend a workshop by Dr. Ronald Rael (Professor of Architecture @ Berkeley), and he mentioned that as concerns building with adobe bricks, with proper roofing, rain is a minimal to non-existent issue. I am not entirely convinced, however, and have also heard of solutions such as using “plasticure” on the outside of the walls.

Or look into building with earth, as used to be the practice: https://www.calearth.org/ and https://www.rael-sanfratello.com/made/mud-frontiers

It seems you are right. The blog post reads “I've created HTMJS as a *sarcastic* way to express my thoughts.”

Just happened to me a couple of months ago. Cannot agree with you more.

I especially feel like reading a book after all day at the computer! That being said, there’s not always time for it.

Same in the US. As a green card holder, I cannot leave the U.S. for more than a year. If I do, I lose my permanent resident status.