skj

Not clear what stereotype you're invoking here.

The compression algorithm is that reality only has to be simulated for one person: you, the reader of this comment.

Yes, individuals who cause problems and generally abuse their colleagues should be excluded. <Insert identity selection here> should not be.

Calling "freedom to be yourself" a political idea is really sad and pathetic.

Ah yes, because welcoming all regardless of irrelevant background details precludes quality software.

Sounds like something to store in not-git.

Yes.

GCP rollouts happen over four days, and don't run on Friday. So, Monday it is!

(there is wiggle room, exception granting, and grandfathering on this policy but it's true for many things)

Physiology varies quite a bit.

Use an ear syringe. So much more effective and, to my knowledge, no one has raised serious safety concerns.

Hopefully he doesn't read this and develop a complex :)

Rather, a control group who does not take vitamin D supplements. Choose them randomly and you can find causation (or lack thereof).

Google, which is not known as a bastion of right-wing thought, will indeed match dollar-for-dollar donations to the NRA. Up to a threshold, just like it does for any other charity.

I don't know, but if so, is that relevant? The question was whether or not it was a good deal for Google. It's not zero-sum.

In what way are you buried? I can see your comment.

Does one imagine that the RIAA is substantially worried about this? I don't. I'm sure they see it as a total win.

Would require taking your shoes and socks off, smothering them in sonic gel, and having someone who knows how operate the wand.

It's a new virus each time. Each time, it diminishes to zero.

The implication is that they had already solved these problems and redoing the stack has its own cost to consider.

Somewhat less expensive than $15,000.

A ban on politics is not neutral.

Talking about politics provides no liability to Google.

If the tax brackets are 0% for the first $5, and 50% for the second $5, then if you pay one person $10, $7.5 goes into worker pockets. If you pay two people $5, then $10 goes into worker pockets.

Betters, haha

Being pro "treating people with basic human dignity" should not be a political stance, but here we are.

Heat, probably.

That's fair. To be clear, I wasn't denying the claim, just asking for your thoughts around it.

I tip 20% rounded up to the nearest dollar every time, unless I'm really disappointed with the service which is quite rare.

Briefly, any drive (floppy disk or tape drive) has some likelihood of failure. You can minimize loss of data (the reliability being discussed) by replicating data in more than one storage item. It just becomes a matter of how many you buy (and how good you are at keeping them all properly organized).

Racist/sexist in that it allows racists and sexists to express their biases via poor tips? Or something else.

That's correct.