1,448 karma · joined September 20, 2011
This was a huge hit that helped to spark runaway debts and inflation, to be sure.
But I'd go further back and say The Fed. It did more than anyone to give us the roaring 20's and the great depression.
That's less and less the case as their revenues are collapsing. Facebook being the gatekeeper is one of their ways of not being defeated by citizen journalism.
More and more, large corporate and monied interests are funding these media outlets to promote their agenda.
So does every left-leaning outlet.
See what I did there?
This is an attempt by the media to control the narrative by gatekeeping what's "real news" and what isn't: i.e. what they disagree with or citizen/independent journalism that is beating traditional media in providing better coverage.
They aren't compelled to. One of the electors from WA says they won't vote if Clinton wins. It's pretty unprecedented, however.
They're still working on figuring out the rest of the goals.
What would they have to do to appear unbiased but still be able to release information damaging to the DNC and Clintons?
For a long time now, all forms of traditional media have had a bent. It's just gotten very monied and politicized as of late.
If you have some time, scroll through the Wikileaks Twitter. Very little noise, mostly content. https://twitter.com/wikileaks
Guilting people and sending out messaging like this is an attack on people's notion of self-determination and self-worth.
It's actually possible for independent people to all hate the new Ghostbusters film. It doesn't require orchestration to have taste.
Because they work for the Clintons and Saudi Arabia.
Fully agreed and totally expected for people to do this. But Twitter is going so far as to ban people who haven't made threats, but that Twitter considers evil.
EDIT: They're also shadowbanning many accounts of those who support Trump. Scott Adams recently switched his endorsement, and within a few days was shadowbanned.