1,448 karma · joined September 20, 2011
You should try Brave if you haven't already.
They'll be sure to vote established people's money for themselves.
If you don't agree with all of this, you are literally Hitler.
http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Intel-forces-yoga-gro...
Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program in the first place. So if you're as clever as you can be when you write it, how will you ever debug it? -Brian Kernighan https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Brian_Kernighan
I love Ruby. I hate Rubyistas that make code that's impossible for others to read or comprehend. I find the rails source actually pretty good here.
No it doesn't. What is even going on in there?!?
LOL didn't you read lines 385-472 of some_ruby_interpreter_file.c on MRI version 2.2.1p347?
...
When we're looking to write programming languages to make our ability to program more concise and powerful, clever tricks and hacks defeat the purpose. Those belong in the 90's and earlier.
To sell off a division that sold low-power chips for tiny margins in an industry that never, ever, ever explodes (until it did) was just plain normal. He would have gotten pressure and funny looks from the industry and shareholders if he didn't sell it off.
Savings fund investment. The more savings there are, the cheaper it is to find funds for investing in a project. The cheaper the capital expenditure, the easier it is to turn a profit.
Or are you talking about the paradox of thrift?
This isn't about democratization of data and journalism, and it's not about "everyone has a press"
It's about large monied institutions using strong news brands to provide news not for enlightening people, but for their consumption so that they can continue feeding narratives that people already believe. It's not news, it's programming.
Every time you blink, you blow up a planet with life on it