smegma2

The 'just move' argument doesn't work. People want to live here and improve the country at the same time. Likewise, someone may say to someone who advocates for higher taxes 'waive you citizenship and move to Sweden,' which is equally unfair

Another one is The Collector by Fowles. It reminded me a lot of Lolita, for example in both books the narrator refuses to take responsibility for their actions.

What's missing in .net core/standard for it to be a Java alternative today? I work with .net on windows so I'm not sure.

Cool, thanks for the paper. It looks interesting from the abstract.

That's what I'm wondering, is there a way to measure how common this situation is? I'd be curious to see

Do we have something to compare this number to? Don't we expect most crimes to not go to trial, if the convicted person agrees that they committed the crime?

The parent comment was comparing Android with JingOS, not iOS.

There are other productive activities besides those that increase your wealth. For example, if I'm trying to learn an instrument, then I would consider practicing to be a productive activity. In this sense productivity is not a scam at all; it's a necessity to live a good life.

Speaking purely in terms of money: yes, doubling the productivity of those working for you is better than doubling your own productivity. But many of us don't have that option. If you are a normal employee, increasing your productivity is one of the few ways to increase your earnings.

My understanding of what you said is that most productive things we do are for someone else's benefit, therefore we shouldn't have an interest in tracking our productivity.

But why not argue the following instead: Most productive things we do are for someone else's benefit, so let's try to fill our time with more things that our productive to ourselves. Would you agree with this take?

Is this a criticism of the format? What format would you suggest that doesn't have this quality?

I don't see why this would be a meaningful comparison. Employees make wages, not profits. They do not expect to share profit with their employer. If the company made a loss, they would rightfully not share the loss either.

I was curious about this function:

    fun addRefs(
      a : forall<h> ref<h,int>, 
      b : forall<h> ref<h,int> 
    ) : total ()
    {
      a := 10;
      b := 20;
      return (!a + !b);
    }

Why is it total instead of st<h>? Won't this have a side effect of setting the references?

Yes! There are a few answers here: https://superuser.com/questions/605445/how-to-stream-my-gnu-... I'm using the top one and it works well for me.

I think something like this exists, where you can schedule time with someone to work over video so that you can stay focused. I've seen it mentioned before on here but I don't remember the name.

I would find this more compelling if you gave examples or countries that had a stronger response, otherwise I don't see a reason to criticize this move.

I'm surprised that you didn't know that before, and that you learned this from the article, considering that there's no mention of privilege in it.

`on` runs a binary function by first running a unary function on each argument.

  Prelude> import Data.Function (on)
  Prelude Data.Function> :t on
  on :: (b -> b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> a -> a -> c
  Prelude Data.Function> f = undefined :: Int -> [Int]
  Prelude Data.Function> g = undefined :: Int -> [Int]
  Prelude Data.Function> :t ((&&) `on` (not . null . ($ x))) f g
  ((&&) `on` (not . null . ($ x))) f g :: Bool

Alternatively in Control.Arrow there's a 'fanout' operator &&&:

  Prelude Control.Arrow> f = undefined :: Int -> Bool
  Prelude Control.Arrow> g = undefined :: Int -> Bool
  Prelude Control.Arrow> :t uncurry (&&) . (f &&& g)
  uncurry (&&) . (f &&& g) :: Int -> Bool

Of course it's still probably simpler to just write it out in this case.

Why would we judge them by that standard? Monads are useful models for plenty of things. That has nothing to do with how many monad tutorials are out there.

I think you're confusing two different areas of law enforcement.

How is it not well defined when we can observe positive correlations between unrelated cognitive tasks?

Is this true? On Google I only see mentions of using voice data to improve their speech transcribing.

Yes, some sites are more resilient somehow. I experience the same thing with twitter. You could try flushing your dns cache but IIRC that didn't even work for me.

I don't think this is particularly relevant to the post.

Not sure what you're getting at here, but this sounds like a rare occurrence i.e. difficult

What was the problem exactly? I don't see any issues with generating e.g. an infinite list of random numbers in Haskell.

How do you propose to stop two [groups of] people from willingly making a trade agreement? If you have an issue with it, what gives you the right, or ability to stop them?

Do teachers wield massive political power?

That makes sense, thanks.

This sounds wrong to me, what would be the analogue of the door being revealed?

A negative income tax would only discourage earning money in the same way that a progressive income tax does anyway, right? Or do you mean more from a psychological perspective?